jeffro151
Supervisor
500 OTC
A shitty player draft would be the first one I've ever sat out lol. How about instead of year limits, we just cap it? Open up any year, but limit the number of HOF player via a capI like that but it seems like this would be hard to research, there isn't a website for shittiest players of all time, at least not that I know of. I guess we could just go back and look at each draft.
having Bo Jackson compared to the other backs in here would be having your starting running back go down on his second carry of the game and have to play the rest of the way with nothing but your fullback (which luckily is at least a HoFer for you).
So Bo gets looked at like he is injury prone while others don't. Bo Jackson would have been elite RB if it wasn't for the fluke injury. Don't understand why he gets hated on so much on these drafts. I do have the best o-line out of everyone and the best backup RB/FB to help carry the load.
I'm not one who discounts Bo. As I've said, every great RB ever were to come to an in their prime tryout, in front of a bunch of coaches who knew no names, Bo would get a lot of looks as one who'd make the teamSo Bo gets looked at like he is injury prone while others don't. Bo Jackson would have been elite RB if it wasn't for the fluke injury. Don't understand why he gets hated on so much on these drafts. I do have the best o-line out of everyone and the best backup RB/FB to help carry the load.
Would have been....that's what I always dislike about Bo in these. We don't actually know what he would have been because he never reached it. It wasn't just the injury. It was splitting time between two sports and never really reaching his potential in either of them.
Besides, I am not talking about his injury per say, I am talking about his production. I would look at Brian Bosworth the same way - and Steve Tasker for that matter. It's not that he wasn't an athletic freak, it was that he never produced much on a football field, which happens when you miss at least 5 games a year to play another sport.
As far as the Boz and roids.....95% of the league was on them at that time. 90% of the guys in today's NFL have taken them at some point, HS, college or pro.Bo was great when he played and that's all you can judge him on. Who knows what he would have done if he stayed in the nfl for 10+ years. The Boz was only good because of roids (maybe be wrong on that) and Tasker well I know nothing about him. I just goggled great WR's not in hall of game and his was in the list. I feel I built my team on a running offense with a great offensive line so to have Bo and Franco would be hard to stop.
As far as the Boz and roids.....95% of the league was on them at that time. 90% of the guys in today's NFL have taken them at some point, HS, college or pro.
If you're playing to win....I'd leave Dash at 2nd. If Dash isn't as good at 3rd as he is at 2nd, you've basically weakened two positions, 2nd and 3rd. My advice would be to move the kid up at 3rd base, which shortens his throw, and spend extra time having him make that throw. One good drill for a third baseman is to take a bucket of balls, toss him a hot grounder, let him make the throw, as soon as he lets it go, toss another he has to come in on and have him throw it and keep charging as you throw a 3rd thats a slow roller and throw it. Have him do this 8-10 time a practice. He'll improve quickly
So Bo gets looked at like he is injury prone while others don't. Bo Jackson would have been elite RB if it wasn't for the fluke injury. Don't understand why he gets hated on so much on these drafts. I do have the best o-line out of everyone and the best backup RB/FB to help carry the load.
500 you need to repick cuz Strokes took him a few rounds ago.