themuzzer
Well-Known Member
I think the problem with having a regular do it is that if he gets injured, you're fucked.
The logic against it makes sense, but I just think it's telling that all 32 teams always carry a long snapper.
I think it would be real easy to replace a guy that snaps a ball for kicks if a injury occurred. That's his only job.
Much like Hanson going down and Suh kicking.....Do we need to carry a 2nd kicker in case Akers goes down?
You suck it up for that game and get a guy on Monday morning. My opinion on it.
I just feel we could open a spot on the roster for borderline guys then a LS
32 teams may carry one, not sure on that. Do any of those 32 teams use that same player for anything other then LS?