- 171,615
- 52,936
- 1,033
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Location
- Still stuck here in Nashville
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 150,519.67
They are going to review it.
I would say Kyrie def. would if he was fully healthy- but at some point having 3 knee surgeries on the same knee at the age of 26 might catch up with a guy---- and its not like Kyrie a is Rose or Wall or Westbrook level athlete. His shooting should sustain him for a long time but if he loses some athleticism his going-to-the-rim days might not last as long as thy would have.I think Kyrie has a really good shot of getting there based on his overall resume to date, but he has a lot more work to do.
And you are correct. There are quite a few players better than Kyrie. That said, most of the don't have a ring. That counts for a lot even though he was Robin.
So, call me crazy, but I do think this is a must win game.
For Indiana.
If they have any desire to win this series, they had better do it before game 7. Because chances of them beating LeBron in Cleveland in game 7 are slim.
If Cleveland is able to win today, I give them about a 75% chance to take the series. If Indiana wins, they will have about an 85-90% chance.
yah - whoever wins this game is going to win the series I would say.So, call me crazy, but I do think this is a must win game.
For Indiana.
If they have any desire to win this series, they had better do it before game 7. Because chances of them beating LeBron in Cleveland in game 7 are slim.
If Cleveland is able to win today, I give them about a 75% chance to take the series. If Indiana wins, they will have about an 85-90% chance.
yah - whoever wins this game is going to win the series I would say.
But I'll respond anyway, because I can.In his apex, Rose never had the opportunity to win a ring. HOF is based on individual credentials for the most part. Rose had a league MVP in his name, Kyrie didn't. Again, before the knee injuries Rose was considered one of the best players in the league and HOF bound.
This really doesn't require another response.
But I'll respond anyway, because I can.
We've already established rings don't really matter for HOF considerations, I mentioned Kyrie's to help put this in perspective: how can you use player A (Rose) as the standard when player B (Kyrie) has already surpassed player A??
Again, this is a bad example from you.
This doesn't require a response.
But I'll respond anyway, because I can.
We've already established rings don't really matter for HOF considerations, I mentioned Kyrie's to help put this in perspective: how can you use player A (Rose) as the standard when player B (Kyrie) has already surpassed player A??
Again, this is a bad example from you.
This doesn't require a response.
Who has established that?
Rings absolutely matter.
Players like James Worthy, Kevin McHale, James Parish and Dennis Rodman were all very good players, but they aren't sniffing the Hall if they played on teams that never won championships.
There are many considerations for the HOF. If you don't win, you had better be an MVP caliber player. Westbrook, Harden, Ewing, Malone, etc.
But, there are many second and third option type players from championship teams that make it.
Cavs going with matching suits again