calsnowskier
Sarcastic F-wad
There are other teams than the Mets, you know...Does anybody even get close to .300 anymore? All I ever seem to see are numbers like .260 or .245.
There are other teams than the Mets, you know...Does anybody even get close to .300 anymore? All I ever seem to see are numbers like .260 or .245.
With the emphasis on slugging, and pitching being good all across the leagues, will we ever see a .400+ hitter again?
That's because you're looking at the Mets.
There are other teams than the Mets, you know...
I believe it was Gary Sheffield that criticized Ichiro years ago (he's an ass but he has somewhat of a point). All Ichiro did was slap singles (or at least a whole shit load, which was his job). Most of the best hitters in the league are expected to do more than simply get a hit. Example, a guy like Miguel Cabrera could probably get much closer to .400 if all he was trying to do was make contact and get a hit but instead he's trying to get an extra base hit, he's trying to drive in runs, he's swinging for the fences. So in that regard I think we already have people that could hit .400 that simply are doing more than padding their batting average.
Ted Williams was the last to hit .400 for a season and he did it while slugging .735.
Side note: 1941, Williams' slash line: .406/.553/.735/1.287/235. He finished 2nd in MVP voting. Goes to show he wasn't very popular with the voters.
in 1941, did OBP or SLG even exist? I think the ONLY stats they looked at back then was BA, RBI and HR.Ted Williams was the last to hit .400 for a season and he did it while slugging .735.
Side note: 1941, Williams' slash line: .406/.553/.735/1.287/235. He finished 2nd in MVP voting. Goes to show he wasn't very popular with the voters.
BA is soooo over-rated. OPS is a MUCH better stat that shows a hitters true contribution.
At the end of the day, a double is worth more than a single and a walk is worth about the same. BA ignores both of these facts, while OPS takes both into account (while granting a slight bonus for a single over a walk).
So what this would indicate is that defense has gotten way better? That fielders are getting to more balls that used to drop in for hits?
Cause I thought ERA's used to be lower, too
in 1941, did OBP or SLG even exist? I think the ONLY stats they looked at back then was BA, RBI and HR.
????Batting average is about as overrated as OPS
Personally, I think every facet of the game has gotten better.
Also, Not defending or attacking the voters, but the Spanks did beat the Sox by 17 games that year, and Teddy was just a kid while DiMaggio was much more established.
Like I said, I am not supporting the vote. But when player A plays for the 1st place team that finished 17 games ahead of the 2nd place team and is also a well-established star on the darling team for the country, I can see why he will receive a few additional votes over the kid on the "losing" team.They also looked at WAR back then.
Anyway, 1941 BA - HR - RBI
JD - .357 - 30 - 125
TW - .406 - 37 - 120
Basically, yes.So, because DiMaggio was a more popular player for a better team, he got the MVP over the better playing Williams.
Obviously, you're right.
Buck hitting 1.000Daniel Norris is hitting .500