- Thread starter
- #41
MHSL82
Well-Known Member
Jordan Chiles won a bronze in the individual floor exercise finals.
At that time, her coach had submitted an appeal that she should have had a higher start value. It was granted, and she got the points she needed to get to 3rd place.
However, a week later, the Court of Arbitration said that her coach submitted the appeal too late. The appeal is supposed to be within 60 seconds. And that their rulings are final and no appeals are allowed.
And that she had to give up her bronze to Romanian Ana-Maria Bărbosu.
Jordan Chiles said why not split the bronze? It's been done before.
USA Gymnastics also says they have video evidence that the appeal occurred within 47 seconds. The Court of Arbitration says all rulings are final, and that they don't consider new evidence.
Now, Romanian Gymnastics Federation is saying split the bronze 3 ways, with Romanian Sabrina Maneca-Voinea being added to the mix. Maneca-Voinea's floor exercise score was also controversial.
USA Gymnastics is going to appeal to the Swiss Federal Tribunal.
As an attorney, I’ve seen many times where someone is too late and they said we can’t appeal, but I feel it is ridiculous that you can’t appeal that you turned it in on time. It’s not asking for forgiveness or extenuating circumstances, but rather that it was submitted on time, that should never be final. You should have a certain amount of time to show it, you couldn’t just come out years later and say that you turned it in 47 minutes, but still, as long as that evidence is produced timely (reasonable definition of timely), there’s no reason why that should not be appealed.