lasgop8
Lets do this!
Im reading a lot about Prov being traded stories. Today was article in the Athletic. In another article two teams were mentioned Vegas and Minn.
I feel that with Torts as coach and given the identity of this franchise that is becoming more and more clear, you don't want any one player being paid north of $6-7 million per season unless they are without question a top line superstar or elite, top pairing defenseman. So, obviously you move JvR, Hayes and give serious thought to Provy/Couturier, depending on what the return is. Also, no more signing any free agents for $7+ million unless it is a Gaudreau or someone of equal or greater caliber.
If someone like Konecny keeps producing at this rate, he will be worth $7 million easily on his next deal and we'll be happy to pay him too.
Bottom line: We would rather develop a youngster at $1-3 million per or pay some home-grown talent that has earned a new paycheck than overpay a veteran in the offseason that isn't deserving of that kind of money. It's a true team effort and no one player should be making significantly more than anyone else unless it is clear that he's an absolute offensive stud (that can still hold his own defensively too of course) or a perennial Vezina candidate (like Vasilevskiy).
The draft is not the only way see Rangers as direct proof.Agree 100%. With the way the cap is and how dumb GMs are in free agency, you have to build like this. Very few guys get to free agency that can truly be a difference maker. Because they're drafted, signed to a bridge deal, then signed to a huge deal. So before anyone even has a chance to sign one of those 'build around him' guys, the team that drafted has him signed until he's 32. Just with that, the talent you're picking from in free agency is watered down. And there's lots of teams seeking that watered down talent, and boom you have overpaid mid-tier guys.
There's no other way to build a team than through the draft. It's why tanking exists. It's why people sell every spare part they have at the deadline for whatever draft picks they can get for them. Hextall knew this and tried to do this. He just didn't truly hit on enough of his picks (or the Flyers didn't develop them right). The plan was right, the execution was poor.
The draft is not the only way see Rangers as direct proof.
Man that would be a worse raping than the Sharks did to the Bruins for Thornton, lol.Do you think that will take JVR for McKinnon straight up?
Zibanajad tradeProof of what? 10th best points percentage in the league? 0 cups? Missing the playoffs 3 out of the last 5 years?
Even if there was something to celebrate for the Rangers their best player (probably the best goalie in the league) was a Rangers draft pick. And they drafted half of their top 10 in scoring (Kreider, Chytil, Miller, Lafreniere, and Kakko).
Their 2 best skaters are Panarin and Fox, and yes they came from the outside. Panarin refused to sign anywhere but NYR. Fox refused to sign with with Calgary after being a 3rd round pick and played in college until he could sign somewhere else. Then refused to sign for Carolina after they acquired his rights, then finally signed in a New York. So, again, even if there was something to celebrate in NYR, this isn't a reliably repeatable process. It's sitting around hoping something falls in to your lap.
The one piece that could maybe fit in to a 'build a contender through trades and free agency' is Zibanejad. They downright stole him from Ottawa and it's one of the more lopsided trades in recent NHL history. Excellent job by their GM on that trade. But that also took a horrible mistake from the other GM to pull off. I'll grant you, finding dumb GMs might be a repeatable process, but you're gunna need a few Zibanejad-level trades to pull it off.
And before you get in to "who would you rather be", of course I'd rather be in the Rangers position. I don't think there's a team in the league that I wouldn't trade the Flyers situation for. Fletcher took Hextall's failure and doubled down on some of those guys and then tried to add through free agency and trades and put them even further in the hole. Fletcher had the opportunity to cut bait and start again, but he tried to go free agency / trading and it made it worse.
Then I’ll keep it short. What have the Rangers won?Zibanajad trade
Panarin Free agent
Trouba free agent
Fox trade
Lindgren trade
Trouchek free agent
I dont need a long winded post to prove my point but hey you type away.
The point is you put those 6 players on any team and they are instantly a Stanley cup threat just like the Rangers are.Then I’ll keep it short. What have the Rangers won?
The point is you put those 6 players on any team and they are instantly a Stanley cup threat just like the Rangers are.
So there is more than one way to build a cup contender other than just the draft.
Maybe you should read your own posts instead of just typing so long "There's no other way to build a team than through the draft. "They’ve won nothing. Just like the Flyers have won nothing.
But sure. Keep trying it. 50 years is probably not enough evidence.
With Hakstol. He’ll win a cup b4 the Flyers. Oh the humanityIts really embarrassing that another expansion team is much better than us in 2 years. How are we this mediocre/ bad for so long?