First ballot lock. National champion at MSU. DPOY, multiple all star, 4 rings anchoring the D on one of the greatest teams ever. Add the personality...dude's twice the Hall of Famer Dennis Rodman is. First ballot.I’m not so sure Green is a Hall of Famer. He boast some impressive playoff numbers, but a Hall of Famer… not so sure.
Or thrown a dude through a window. But man they remind me of each other. Not identical but like different versions of the same arc. But one the better player, no rings, vs the 'lesser' player...with 4Chuck was obviously superior offensively.
But, Dray chews his fat, lazy ass up defensively and as a playmaker.
I think people have embraced this cuddly, playful post playing persona Barkley to the point that they forget how much of a asshole he was on the court.
Draymond has never spit on a child.
Would you be praising Barkley so much if he had never played for Phoenix?I’m not so sure Green is a Hall of Famer. He boast some impressive playoff numbers, but a Hall of Famer… not so sure.
Antics aside, the main reason I hate Draymond is because of the numerous times he has literally slapped the shit out of Blake on the court.Or thrown a dude through a window. But man they remind me of each other. Not identical but like different versions of the same arc. But one the better player, no rings, vs the 'lesser' player...with 4
YesWould you be praising Barkley so much if he had never played for Phoenix?
He's got an anger issue man. It's not your typical competitive fire type anger either.
He's extremely entertaining off the court though.
I agree Greens on court antics will actually boost his popularity when he retires. The major difference between Barkley and Green on the court… Barkley was a far superior player.
Ben Wallace was questionable when he got in. Either way, the criteria is subject. Greens was an amazing defender, but he benefited from being on a team with 2 of the greatest shooters in NBA history.
Ben Wallace was questionable when he got in. Either way, the criteria is subject. Greens was an amazing defender, but he benefited from being on a team with 2 of the greatest shooters in NBA history.
i’m not saying he won’t get in, I’m just not sure if he should be considered a lock.
I’m not quite sure what your arguing, if anything.Of course he did.
It is the Hall of Fame, not the hall of best basketball players.
There are a lot of guys in the Hall that are only there because they played on teams who were very successful.
Playing in June every year makes a player more “famous”. And Draymond has been incredibly valuable to the Warriors during their run.
Curry and Klay are stone cold locks. Green might as well be too, but not quite on the same level.
I’m not quite sure what your arguing, if anything.
My original point was Green will be a great commentator and his on court antics will help him secure a job. I don't think Barkley is a great commentator. He is entertaining, but nothing special. What can’t be argued is Barkley is a far superior player than Green.
Yep wiggy is a clown. I pay attention to bronny a lot and he is a much improved playerHe's put in a lot of work over the last year and you can easily see the difference. Anyone that still says he's only gotten his ranking because of his dad isn't paying attention
Credit where it's due Poole turned it around, he was great down the stretch and they don't win without him. If he could just be consistent...
Kuminga too...he's really emerging now
He's a lockBen Wallace was questionable when he got in. Either way, the criteria is subject. Greens was an amazing defender, but he benefited from being on a team with 2 of the greatest shooters in NBA history.
i’m not saying he won’t get in, I’m just not sure if he should be considered a lock.