Wamu
whats-a-matta-u?
should Steph Curry really be a 2 time MVP winner?
I mean- a few guys can carry a team in the league. He is not one of them.
LeBron, Kawhi, Embiid, Jokic, Durant...maybe a couple others? maybe not?
I mean- i get why Curry won them- and the logic behind it--- but when you strip it down--- can you really say he was the most valuable player in the league when he cant carry a team?
predictably- they are .500 thus far. So few guys have won multiple MVPs in the league- its rare company. I know Curry is great- but are we kind of getting a little bit of a sight adjustment now?
was Curry ever one of the 5 best players in the NBA? I dont know. I think cases could be made both ways that are logical.
It's funny how your dumbfuckery has no end. Should Steph really be a 2x MVP? Hell yes. He's the only NBAer to win the award unanimously. He's the best shooter the league has ever seen and will get into the HOF on his first try.
You asked if he was ever one of the five best players? Holy shit you're an ignorant jackass. Asking if the only unaminous MVP is any good.
You're such a clown.