Scooby-Doo
Ruh-roh
Lol at “handily beating”
Lol at “handily beating”
Um, we were up, 2-1.Lol at “handily beating”
That's called leading not handily beating homer...Um, we were up, 2-1.
Our 2 wins were 109-102 and 109-95.That's called leading not handily beating homer...
and your game 1 loss was 99-90 so.....Our 2 wins were 109-102 and 109-95.
We weren't struggling vs them at all before AD got hurt.
We had the momentum with 2 back to back wins before AD got hurt.and your game 1 loss was 99-90 so.....
We had the momentum with 2 back to back wins before AD got hurt.
Um, we were up, 2-1.
Not exactly "handily beating. The Lakers had taken control of the series, but it's not like they were blowing the Suns out.
MSN
www.msn.com
Our 2 wins were 109-102 and 109-95.
We weren't struggling vs them at all before AD got hurt.
That's how the league works. See post number 422Why are we still talking about the Lakers?
That's how the league works. See post number 422
So 422 didn't happen?see post 432
So 422 didn't happen?
It's the Lakers. Same as the Yankees/Red Sox in MLB or Patriots in NFL or Alabama in CFBI don't think anyone in the NBA expected great ratings with 2 small market teams in the finals.
How is this relevant to DJ saying the Lakers were handily beating the Suns because they had a 2-1 series lead? I have no clue