Orange Crush77
Well-Known Member
I’m so confused
I think the biggest thing with Ruggs is he actually completes the offensive overhaul. He provides the one element we are missing, pure speed playmaking ability. His mere presence on the field opens everything up, from the running game to intermediate passing, to taking the top off. And more importantly he gives our young qb the proper toolbox to compete with.
We have a BINGO!!
If Ruggs is on most other D1 schools people wouldn’t be bitchin’ about his stats either.
If college stats decided draft prospects teams like Washington State and Texas Tech would be NFL factories!
we’re talking top 2 school in the country with a QB going top 5. Big difference between Bama and TT.
It's funny I see mocks saying Philly needs to trade up to 15 for Ruggs. Like Denver doesn't need WRs. I will say trading up for a WR makes sense when you have an established QB and a playoff team. Denver is rising but hardly a playoff team.
I disagree that Denver is not a playoff team. The Defense should be great especially if the guys come back healthy.
Good post, Chris. There have been some really good WRs historically selected in the 2nd. But you could make that argument for almost any position. I think there will be at least 6 and maybe 7 WRs taken this year in round 1. I’m not confident that getting the 8th or 9th best WR has great odds of being that perfect match.
if Broncos have one of the top 3 WRs on the board at 15 and pass on one of them or trade back - I’m going to go all Brock O on them like I did when we passed on Lavonte David and instead simply had BO.
Great post.
Where have you been? Did you sleep in?