Chewbaccer
Illustrious Potentate
Waltrip is not a top tier racer. So he wasnt winning but with that DEI equipment he was in the top ten a lot & had no business up there. All three cars showed well. (when Dale Sr was alive) Again. The year the Taurus was introduced they had such an advantage over Chevy. The only Chevy driver competing with them was Jeff Gordon. DW replaced for Steve Parks (when he got hurt) for I dont remember. Something like 7 or 9 races. He was 2nd in points of non ford drivers in that span (Gordon was 1st) DEI had some ponies back then. I know this because DW was my favorite race car driver all time. He was rideless & washed up, yet still managed to be in the top ten in points during that span. DEI equipment did not suck back then.
My point about being in yates equipment. Is it wasnt considered good equipment, it was top of the line equipment (like what Dale Jr had his whole career) So for fans that look at stats only as the measuring stick. Yes. He would be considered one of the greats if he raced that his whole career. (equipment like Jr had) I already said Rudd doesnt compare to Dale Sr. (who didnt have top equipment his whole career) Bottomline if Rudd was lucky enough to land yates equipment early in his career. he would have had a shit ton of victories, which those of you that claim "results are what matter" would be calling him one the greats. been around racing my whole life. I completely understand better drivers having lesser results.
I completely agree Dale Jr. was a solid driver & he probably does get both. Downplayed & up played for who he is.
We are just gonna disagree on at what level.
Today's racing with all the technology & aero sensitivity is so much about the car (team) you drive than the driver. Equipment is key to making a career or breaking one. (even if comparing two racers at the exact same skill level)
Non Dale Jr DEI wins:
Michael Waltrip- 4
Steve Park- 2
Martin Truex Jr- 1
Dale Jr raced exactly one season(his rookie season) at DEI while Dale was still alive, it was a good team, but was not on the level of Hendrick, Gibbs, Yates, or Roush during its time, and it really fell off as Jr's career went on, and it certainly isn't on the same level of the DiGard/Childress/Bud Moore/Hendrick/Yates equipment that Rudd had the majority of his career.
What I've been saying, is your claim of Rudd not racing in top equipment is a fallacy.
I mean, look at all the races DW won with DiGard from 75-80, and then how many Bobby Allison won with DiGard from 82 on, and Rudd's winless 81 campaign with them sticks out like a sore thumb.
I love Ricky Rudd, but no matter the equipment, he was good for one win a year, 2 tops. That was proven with the top equipment in the sport. It's what he did with Childress, it's what he did with Bud Moore, and it's what he did with Hendrick.
Solid career, but not as good as Dale Jr.