2019-2020 Official Regular Season Thread

[dtgold88]

Dude. Let it go. What do you care what these clowns post?

I think what you meant to say was "dude, let it go. No need to further make a fool of yourself comparing fans reaction to a hit to the head and years of r*pe of boys."

 

[dtgold88]

‘Care’ is far from the correct thought process.
I just like to call them out as the morons they are.
They can tuck tail and run now.

you compared fans' reaction to an unnecessary hit to the head to the guy who started and continued the fight to fans' reaction to a coach allowing years of r*pe of his players.

Lie, dance, deflect, distort. You cannot get past this.

 

[dtgold88]

You mean like you saying Rudolph provoked it?

He did provoke it. Twice.

and, yes, Garrett went way over the line.

 

[dtgold88]

Nobody's forcing you to read any of it, but you continue to do so, so you can tell me not to reply.

That makes sense.

you tell him, sport. Maybe scare him and tell him to tuck tale and run

 

[msgkings322]

I think what you meant to say was "dude, let it go. No need to further make a fool of yourself comparing fans reaction to a hit to the head and years of r*pe of boys."

No. Grow up.

 

[dtgold88]

Except thats not even remotely close to what I said.
Take the bet or STFU already.

Not only did you say it, but you doubled and tripled down on. Your "but I was only talking about fans defending their team/player" says exactly as you are accused.

 

[bksballer89]

No. Grow up.

I'm just confused why this Browns/steelers thing that took place on thursday is still a topic on this board

 

[dtgold88]

Garret deserves his suspension.


I never said he didn’t. He was an idiot.

my point was three fold

-he was provoked

- it was in the heat of passion

- the harm was minimal if not non existent

Not really debatable from any rational fan with no agenda.

Suspension might be a little harsh, but it can be justified. However, NFL's own rules do say what he did constitutes a 15 yard flag. Nothing about suspension.

 

[dtgold88]

Take the bet fucktard

You in this case is the same as the douches below.
Fucking losers , mental midgets, mind controlled by the colors on a uniform.

Paterno was fired in 2011 amid the shocking Jerry Sandusky sexual abuse scandal, so needless to say, he’s become a pretty polarizing figure since his death in early 2012. Such was the case Saturday. When the stadium showed a Paterno tribute video in the second quarter, many fans responded with a roaring ovation.

The idea you keep bringing this up is beyond foolish...even for you which is saying a lot.

 

[Black Adam]

I'm just confused why this Browns/steelers thing that took place on thursday is still a topic on this board

please. it ain't a hard case to crack...

 

[dtgold88]

Yet he’s banned from the league.


It was the first suspension for Garrett, the No. 1 pick in the 2017 draft, but not his first brush with controversy for rough play this season. He was fined more than $50,000 in September for a collection of incidents that included his punching a Tennessee Titans player and two roughing-the-passer penalties against the Jets. One of those hits produced a season-ending injury for Jets quarterback Trevor Siemian.


Sure, he was provoked, blame the other guy.

No wonder you support him.
Both cowards. Both douches.

You get we've both said Garrett deserves his suspension. If he appeals and gets less that could also be justified.

Rudolph getting no suspension? That seems silly, but whatever.

 

[dtgold88]

You need to drop this shit. He was comparing the fans mindset in defending those actions.

Might not have been the best comparison, but he didn't compare the actual acts themselves.

Don't even bother responding to because I'll consider it you not dropping it.

ah the usual.....wiggy (and probably now me) needs to drop it but not the one who mentioned it and also cannot let his absurd comment go.

and, yes, he did compare the actual acts by comparing the fanbases trying to justify the acts as being the same thing.

 

[dtgold88]

No. Grow up.

ok, pop.

 

[dtgold88]

No.

I would be strongly condemning Rudolph for what amounts to criminal assault.

Like any rational human would.

I knew hypocrite Wiggy would defend Garrett. I at least thought possible you would see reason.

Guess not.

what more than "Garrett's suspension is justified" do you want to hear from me for it to be reasonable? Because I am also able to add in the fact that Rudolph was the instigator not once, but twice?

and, no, I never for a second thought you'd see reason.

 

[dtgold88]

Have you actually watched an NFL football game lately?

Garrett grabbed him shortly after he threw the ball away. That part was fine.

After Garrett wrapped him up, he spun him around and threw him to the ground well after the ball was gone. That is a 15 yard penalty almost every time.

"spun him around and threw him to the ground?"

I think you've lost it. Garrett held on and pulled him down ON TOP OF HIMSELF

still no....never thought you'd be reasonable.

 

[dtgold88]

did yo ueven watch the play?

hes engaged before the ball is even out

i mean are you being serious right now?

are you honestly trying to say that garrett initiated contact AFTER the ball was out? thats simply not true

use your eyes

I thought it was kind of close, but him saying he spun him and slammed him to the ground was silly. Garrett grabbed him and turned and had Rudolph fall ON TOP.

 

[dtgold88]

Apparently you missed the part where I said "don't bother to reply".

Perhaps you don't need to be posting in here anymore.

Good thing you aren't on a power trip.

 

[dtgold88]

Yes.

Said the engagement part was legal.

The takedown was long after the ball was out.

Not a penalty in 2010. Definitely a penalty in 2019.

The takedown where he hugged him and spun Rudolph on top to land on himself?

 

[dtgold88]

The 3rd one is all that really matters.

If he hit Rudolph with the crown of the helmet, this would play out totally different.

And even without that, it was a horrendous scene.

No disagreement...but he didn't. Just like when a pitcher throws at a hitter IF he hits him in the face the punishment would be different. But when he hits them in the back he misses at most a start or 2.

But I get Garrett's is much longer as what he did is not seen as often as throwing at a batter.

 

[dtgold88]

Welcome to Wiggyland, where arguing semantics is king...

welcome to Land of the Chief, where deflection and ignoring the actual point is his priority.

was he wrong? Is it not possible to use heat of passion to justify murder? Yes, murder...not a scratch on the head (if there was a scratch)