tlance
Kyrie Hater
I dont know if i agree with all of this- in fact- i definitely do not- but wow...the balls on some of these "sources"
The Lakers, like the Cavaliers, are bad without LeBron
When James left for Los Angeles, there were people within the Cleveland Cavaliers' organization who privately joked that "the tread is off his tires."
a member of the Cavaliers told ESPN he thought last season "took a lot out of" the now 34-year-old James.
But here's the biggest difference, perhaps, in what those Cavs teams experienced and where the Lakers are now: James has the wear and tear of all those seasons pushing and prodding and carrying the Cavs under his belt.
When James returns, what if he can't carry this Lakers group -- in a tougher Western Conference and comprised of potential stars alongside him rather than bona fide ones -- the way he used to?
You see, Johnson didn't want L.A. to be Cleveland all over again because the plan was to have James' teammates lift him up just as much as he lifts them up. So far, that has been anything but the case.
I saw an article the other day on hoopsrumors.com about Kevin Love's trade value. Given how much you love to post articles, I am surprised you didn't post that.
Allow me to summarize:
Love's trade value is limited by a very narrow market. Playoff teams in non-destination markets and/or teams that are totally capped out will be the only suitors.
Even then, the Cavs aren't getting a significant asset back (late 1st at best) beyond the matching salary unless they absorb a contract worse than Love's. Because a slow footed injury prone 30 year old on a 5 year contract is closer to a liability than an asset.
Ironically, they would be able to get a lot more for him if he were about to expire.
Then again, most of us called it this summer.