dtgold88
Well-Known Member
Looking like Dallas will lose their pick to Atlanta so not sure a win hurts them unfortunately. Hope they feel differently though.who is gonna win this MAvs/Suns game tonight?
Looking like Dallas will lose their pick to Atlanta so not sure a win hurts them unfortunately. Hope they feel differently though.who is gonna win this MAvs/Suns game tonight?
The hell are you talking about? I'm "arguing the post", specifically your repeated posts mischaracterizing another post as a "meltdown".Oh...does this mean you acknowledge you saw the post to which I refer that he has since deleted?
And, yes, it was a meltdown complete with expletives, namecalling, etc. All because of a comment I made that really wasn't all that serious.
But keep being Argue the Poster and not the Post Guy if you want.
Can't recall who suggested this (trojan, maybe), but I like the Vucevic, Beal route for them.I'd go the low-key route and go Kemba and Beal.
They aren't getting Durant or Kawhi and while Kyrie is definitely a very productive player my concern is him keeping his head right in L.A.
You really need to stop with the meltdowns. Think of your blood pressure.Damn. Just give that topic a rest. All I said (yet you won't listen) is I was only talking about Klay & Love. I'd take Klay. How many more times do I have to tell you that? Then you created your own reality. Now I'm done w/ this beaten to death topic. If you continue to talk about it I won't respond. There's nothing more to say.
Oh...does this mean you acknowledge you saw the post to which I refer that he has since deleted?
And, yes, it was a meltdown complete with expletives, namecalling, etc. All because of a comment I made that really wasn't all that serious.
But keep being Argue the Poster and not the Post Guy if you want.
It's probably the best they can doCan't recall who suggested this (trojan, maybe), but I like the Vucevic, Beal route for them.
McFly? You were the one who revived "that topic". Kind of a "Do as I Say, Not as I Do" type of fellow are ya?Damn. Just give that topic a rest. All I said (yet you won't listen) is I was only talking about Klay & Love. I'd take Klay. How many more times do I have to tell you that? Then you created your own reality. Now I'm done w/ this beaten to death topic. If you continue to talk about it I won't respond. There's nothing more to say.
Can't recall who suggested this (trojan, maybe), but I like the Vucevic, Beal route for them.
so, yes, you saw the post he claims does not exist?The hell are you talking about? I'm "arguing the post", specifically your repeated posts mischaracterizing another post as a "meltdown".
That's part of your schtick, misusing and overusing words like "meltdown", "gaffe", and so on.
OK.....we'll go with that. sure, buddy.So the only way you can defend yourself is lie about a post I never made? Got it.
Option 3, keep teasing you until we see an actual meltdown. Not the thing you are calling that.so, yes, you saw the post he claims does not exist?
Uh oh.....what do you do? say yes and you are calling him a liar. Say no, and you now you are saying I was incorrect about calling a post a meltdown that now you say never even existed.
Decisions, decisions. I cannot wait for your deflection here or maybe you can get a lifeline and get someone else to help.
He doesn't seem like your buddyOK.....we'll go with that. sure, buddy.
Probably, but I have to say assuming Lebron is still Lebron those would be exceptional pieces to pair with him IMO.It's probably the best they can do
Not what I saw coming, but topnotch deflection.Option 3, keep teasing you until we see an actual meltdown. Not the thing you are calling that.
Look, it's the internet. We can all type whatever we want about someone, doesn't make it true. As you prove over and over.
For example, I know that you run a paedophile ring out of the basement of your pizza parlor. You might respond no you don't, but then you are just being argumentative.
wanted to make sure not to offend.He doesn't seem like your buddy
I am stricking to the topic. Topic is you claimed "every GM" takes Green because of common sense. Weill some said every GM takes Love over green (part of this topic).
I doubt anyone here has access to every GM.
I'll simply respond that I haven't seen a meltdown post from Wamu today. I don't have to look for something that doesn't exist. My whole point being that you often call something a "meltdown" that is anything but. We all have our rhetorical quirks, that's one of yours.Not what I saw coming, but topnotch deflection.
Let's try this......You say I incorrectly called his post a meltdown. Great. What post would you be referring to?
If you don't care to look for a post that no longer exists because it was deleted I understand.
hopson to English - "ya got me"Yawn.
Might need to try harderwanted to make sure not to offend.
A namecalling tirade with F-bombs and needed to be deleted all because someone made a comment in jest is a meltdown.....but well played.I'll simply respond that I haven't seen a meltdown post from Wamu today. I don't have to look for something that doesn't exist. My whole point being that you often call something a "meltdown" that is anything but. We all have our rhetorical quirks, that's one of yours.