CitySushi
Andrew Wiggin's burner account
Shut up, Sushi. It's been very tiring times for me!
Better late than never....
Shut up, Sushi. It's been very tiring times for me!
Well if you're saying you want to see a game where Klay takes 30+ shots, I'm absolutely down for that. LOL.
I completely agree that Thompson is a beneficiary of playing next to Curry, but you don't hear the same arguments when it comes to other all time greats who have played with great talent as well. I think you can only judge for what is in front of you, instead of what ifs. What if Pippen never played with Jordan? Would he be considered one of the greatest of all time, or just a great of his era? What if Shaq never played with Kobe or Wade...does he get any rings? Or what if Magic didn't have the luxury of playing with Kareem? Stockton and Malone. The list goes on.
There are plenty of players who were major beneficiaries of their teammates, but I think it's unfair to hold them to something that they couldn't otherwise prove. Were they lucky in their situations? Absolutely. But I don't think it necessarily changes how they should be viewed.
but counted in defensive metrics.
you get Klay has never signed a max deal, right? You might want to look up opinion and fact before continuing here.Yep, the Warriors are pretty stacked and they have 3 max level players (at least until Durant leaves which is looking more likely)
It's a fact to everyone but you
defensive rebounding is defense. Love's among the best.
But I do love the when fans play the "let's look at defense" when all else fails....easy to do as no great way to "prove" anything.
Curry's, at best, an awful defender. Among the top PGs in the league?
It's just a part of the overall metrics. Being a great rebounder doesn't make you a great defender. Just like leading the league in steals doesn't make you a great defender either. Monta Ellis had back to back seasons averaging over 2 steals a game (which is great). But I can tell you first hand he was an awful defender. All he did was gamble a lot and when he missed he gave up easy buckets. That's not being a good defender.
Did you miss where I mentioned the actual Finals in which they played? And in 2016 he was behind Green. 2017 might have been behind Love. At best, he was no better than 5th in either series.I'd rather have Klay than Kyrie for sure. So he's only behind Lebron, Durant, and Curry otherwise? 3 of the absolute best players in the league? That's your argument, lol?
you get Klay has never signed a max deal, right? You might want to look up opinion and fact before continuing here.
Ok...at best he's average.Curry at best is an average defender if not a little more. So wrong again.
Yet most defensive metrics (maybe all?) include defensive rebounding as a factorIt affects the defense by preventing another possession. It does nothing to prevent/hinder the initial shot/play however. It's a grey area, like special teams in football.
Ok...at best he's average.
Also means likely he is well below avg.
Think he's a top 3 PG?
Yet most defensive metrics (maybe all?) include defensive rebounding as a factor
No disagreement there.....overall D tough to gauge.Defensive rebounding is absolutely necessary. But, IMO, I feel like deflections is a better indicator of defensive ability. But again, there's no one statistic that determines defensive ability in the NBA.
It's basically like interceptions and passes defended in the NFL. If you have one player who had say 6 interceptions in the season and 7 pass deflections versus a player with maybe 2 interceptions but 13 pass deflections, which player is the better defender? You can't really tell just based on those metric, but both stats, in addition to others can help compile the defensive profile of a player.
Other than Pippen the difference is the guys you mentioned were arguably their team's #1 guy. Klay is his team's #3.Well if you're saying you want to see a game where Klay takes 30+ shots, I'm absolutely down for that. LOL.
I completely agree that Thompson is a beneficiary of playing next to Curry, but you don't hear the same arguments when it comes to other all time greats who have played with great talent as well. I think you can only judge for what is in front of you, instead of what ifs. What if Pippen never played with Jordan? Would he be considered one of the greatest of all time, or just a great of his era? What if Shaq never played with Kobe or Wade...does he get any rings? Or what if Magic didn't have the luxury of playing with Kareem? Stockton and Malone. The list goes on.
There are plenty of players who were major beneficiaries of their teammates, but I think it's unfair to hold them to something that they couldn't otherwise prove. Were they lucky in their situations? Absolutely. But I don't think it necessarily changes how they should be viewed.
No disagreement there.....overall D tough to gauge.
Would add in football, a guy with less INTs and deflections could be being avoided by the offense.
Did you miss where I mentioned the actual Finals in which they played? And in 2016 he was behind Green. 2017 might have been behind Love. At best, he was no better than 5th in either series.
Yet most defensive metrics (maybe all?) include defensive rebounding as a factor
Love has had garbage teams, though. 40 wins in the West with his last Minnesota team is far better than Klay could have done with him.I think Klay is a great secondary star, that fits into the mold of say Pippen where he's not the main guy; but he's an all-star that assists the main guy. That still makes him worthy of a max contract when discussing Klay. If you put Scottie in today's league, he'd likely fill that role and be deserving of a max contract.
Point is, Love's been thrust into the main guy role, and he doesn't really elevate his teams whatsoever. So yes, with Love, we do have a sample size of him being the #1 guy. But it's not great when reviewing the results.
did someone say being a great rebounder makes you a great defender?It's just a part of the overall metrics. Being a great rebounder doesn't make you a great defender. Just like leading the league in steals doesn't make you a great defender either. Monta Ellis had back to back seasons averaging over 2 steals a game (which is great). But I can tell you first hand he was an awful defender. All he did was gamble a lot and when he missed he gave up easy buckets. That's not being a good defender.