• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

2017 NBA Offseason Thread

Gman

Well-Known Member
26,948
24,045
1,033
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,330.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I'll help you out DJ..

The story is coming from a Boston beat writer who works for CBS. No idea on his credibility. He's obviously no woj... but he's not a nobody either.

Interesting.

I'll say it: Boston + Hayward + PG > Cleveland

And toe to toe with Golden State, who Boston has always played tough against and match up well with.
 

Heatles84

Well-Known Member
20,811
6,786
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Key West, FL
Hoopla Cash
$ 654.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Not sure why Boston would even be interested in PG after drafting Tatum and Heyward damn near a lock to sign with Boston.

Heyward's not a lock to sign anywhere.
 

Gman

Well-Known Member
26,948
24,045
1,033
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,330.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Depends on who they give up to get George.
Indiana has lost some leverage...

That being said, 3 of the following?:

- Avery Bradley
- Marcus Smart
- Jae Crowder
- Terry Rozier
- Jaylon Brown
- Jayson Tatum
- future draft consideration
- future draft consideration
 

Heatles84

Well-Known Member
20,811
6,786
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Key West, FL
Hoopla Cash
$ 654.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Interesting.

I'll say it: Boston + Hayward + PG > Cleveland

And toe to toe with Golden State, who Boston has always played tough against and match up well with.

Nope. I'd still take Cleveland Golden State over Boston. To fit PG and Heyward into Boston's salary cap, you're going to have to send off some assets. You're not fitting them all in while maintaining the team as is.
 

knowyourenemy

Well-Known Member
5,985
1,348
173
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Hoopla Cash
$ 200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Is Paul George still on the Pacers?
 

shopson67

Well-Known Member
40,133
16,567
1,033
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Location
Rochester, NY
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Interesting.

I'll say it: Boston + Hayward + PG > Cleveland

And toe to toe with Golden State, who Boston has always played tough against and match up well with.

Are they renouncing all of those cap holds? They'll need to in order to open $27M in cap space (what is the market on Hayward?)
 

Gman

Well-Known Member
26,948
24,045
1,033
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,330.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Nope. I'd still take Cleveland Golden State over Boston. To fit PG and Heyward into Boston's salary cap, you're going to have to send off some assets. You're not fitting them all in while maintaining the team as is.
No doubt Boston has to give some guys / assets up...

But stop a minute. A core of IT, PG, Hayward and Horford is sick-@ss filthy on offense.

The remains of Bradley / Smart / Crowder / Brown will make them a tough perimeter defensive team as well.

Rebounding remains the big issue.
 

Heatles84

Well-Known Member
20,811
6,786
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Key West, FL
Hoopla Cash
$ 654.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
No doubt Boston has to give some guys / assets up...

But stop a minute. A core of IT, PG, Hayward and Horford is sick-@ss filthy on offense.

The remains of Bradley / Smart / Crowder / Brown will make them a tough perimeter defensive team as well.

Rebounding remains the big issue.

You're probably not keeping the core together, especially of your secondary group.

Horford was non-existent for a vast majority of the playoffs. Of the all star group, PG's the only one that's truly elite as a 2-way player. IT lacks any kind of defense. Heyward's average on D, but a good offensive player.

Yes, in theory your team will be good offensively, but have you seen the Warriors on offense AND defense?

You're not thinking rationally because it's your team. That team together, may make you better than Cleveland, but not Golden State.
 

Gman

Well-Known Member
26,948
24,045
1,033
Joined
Sep 21, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,330.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
You're probably not keeping the core together, especially of your secondary group.

Horford was non-existent for a vast majority of the playoffs. Of the all star group, PG's the only one that's truly elite as a 2-way player. IT lacks any kind of defense. Heyward's average on D, but a good offensive player.

Yes, in theory your team will be good offensively, but have you seen the Warriors on offense AND defense?

You're not thinking rationally because it's your team. That team together, may make you better than Cleveland, but not Golden State.
- I think I made it clear that the secondary group would take losses in order to acquire PG
- Let's say 2 of 4 of that secondary group remain... they'll still combine with PG to form a good core of perimeter defenders.
- Horford had a solid playoffs. No idea where you are coming from with that "non-existent for the vast majority" bullsnot
- Boston has played GS tough the past couple of years. I know... that's just the regular season, I recognize that. But if you watch those games like I did... you come away with the impression that Boston matches up well against the Warriors.
 

gordontrue

Bandwagoner
10,359
3,027
293
Joined
Nov 11, 2013
Location
TX
Hoopla Cash
$ 2,550.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
For the 18-19 season, given the cap holds of Bradley and Thomas, I don't see how PG and Heyward are fit in too be honest, along with their core.

Boston Celtics Team Payroll | Basketball-Reference.com

Oh I think Bradley would definitely be gone one way or another.

To me, IT + PG + Hayward is pretty similar to Kyrie + LeBron + Love.

Celtics have more youth and upcoming talent to surround that, but it just depends on who they'd have to ship out to make it happen.

My initial thought, is it puts them right there with Cleveland (as currently constructed) in the East.
 

Heatles84

Well-Known Member
20,811
6,786
533
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Key West, FL
Hoopla Cash
$ 654.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
- I think I made it clear that the secondary group would take losses in order to acquire PG
- Let's say 2 of 4 of that secondary group remain... they'll still combine with PG to form a good core of perimeter defenders.
- Horford had a solid playoffs. No idea where you are coming from with that "non-existent for the vast majority" bullsnot
- Boston has played GS tough the past couple of years. I know... that's just the regular season, I recognize that. But if you watch those games like I did... you come away with the impression that Boston matches up well against the Warriors.

Last couple of years? Where are you coming up with that bullsnot?

You do realize that KD's only been on the Warriors for a year, don't you? Cleveland matched up well with Golden St. too, then they met in the playoffs. Regular season means dick, and I've seen the games between the Warriors and Celtics.

Again, you're not thinking objectively, because it's your team. That core puts you in line with Cleveland, and gives them a challenge, but I still don't see Boston taking down Golden St.
 

knowyourenemy

Well-Known Member
5,985
1,348
173
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Hoopla Cash
$ 200.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Last couple of years? Where are you coming up with that bullsnot?

You do realize that KD's only been on the Warriors for a year, don't you? Cleveland matched up well with Golden St. too, then they met in the playoffs. Regular season means dick, and I've seen the games between the Warriors and Celtics.

Again, you're not thinking objectively, because it's your team. That core puts you in line with Cleveland, and gives them a challenge, but I still don't see Boston taking down Golden St.

I agree with all you've said -- but if it allows them to top Cleveland then it's potentially worth it. Remember when Durant got hurt at the end of the season and suddenly the Warriors didn't seem so invincible? If one of their players goes down, they're beatable. Now, do you build a team around the hope that the Warriors lose a player to injury? No. But I don't think you just throws your hands up and give up because the Warriors look invincible, either.

Look back two years. Curry got banged up and was not 100% in the playoffs. Cleveland exploited it and won the Finals. You can't just give up when you're close to the top of the mountain.
 

DJ Fieri

Generic line for rent here
Supporting Member Level 3
172,267
53,397
1,033
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Location
Still stuck here in Nashville
Hoopla Cash
$ 697,908.79
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Anybody else feel like Lavar was trying to steal the moment from his son being drafted last night?
 
Top