- Thread starter
- #41
bksballer89
Most Popular Member
I like not having a 5th set tiebreaker.
I don't want a 5th set decided by 1 point. A full game is better.
Not when you have 2 clowns who can't break serve
I like not having a 5th set tiebreaker.
I don't want a 5th set decided by 1 point. A full game is better.
Kerber forced to a 3rd set.
good for zverev over isner
isner has overperformed in his career, imo, since he can't move, can't return, and can't hit backhands. not a bad career for having nothing but a serve and forehand.
I'm not disappointed because I don't expect much from a 31 year old tree with a serve and forehand.I get what you're saying about Isner but losing to Zverev after being up 2 sets to 0 is disappointing. This is a guy who is ranked #50 with a career record of 81-124.
i fell asleep about halfway through the 2nd set watching that. thought for sure kyrgios was going to take it.Just saw that Kyrgios was defeated in 5 by Seppi LMFAO. Could not happen to a better guy. Half of the crowd booed him as he left the court.
good for zverev over isner
isner has overperformed in his career, imo, since he can't move, can't return, and can't hit backhands. not a bad career for having nothing but a serve and forehand.
Just saw that Kyrgios was defeated in 5 by Seppi LMFAO. Could not happen to a better guy. Half of the crowd booed him as he left the court.
Pretty clearly a top 30 forehand, so I'd say that's noticeable. The serve alone wasn't enough for him to be a top 20 player for the past 7 consecutive years.I didn't think his forehand was anything noticeable.