they've celebrated twice as many wins against their "rival" in a fraction of the time.
I honestly feel badly for doug at this point.
Over their last 44 meetings dating back to 2015, the Tigers are 12-32 against the Indians.
Over the last twenty seasons, the Wolverines are 4-16 against the Buckeyes.
That's good (or bad) for a combined winning percentage of .250.
Over their last 44 meetings dating back to 2015, the Tigers are 12-32 against the Indians.
File this shit under more fake news.
I look forward to doug avoiding the current and important facts (of football and baseball) and attempting to send the discussion towards important things like Ohtani visiting Detroit (LOL), of Meyer looking for a photographer and, of course, his never-ending and boring comeback of "1948".
The coming baseball season will be tough on doug. I foresee little Tiger bragging, a lot of Verlander butt kissing, and a close following of Kluber and any mis-step the Indians make. In short...trolling.
So are you saying the Tigers have already won the ALc for the '18 season? If so, why even bother watching baseball next year?
Doug will declare the Tigers AL Champions shortly after he states Ohtani signs with Detroit and they trade Ian Kinsler to get Stanton.
I'm sure Michigan will likely beat whatever schlub opponent they get in their 2nd rate bowl game. Then Doug will return to clamoring about how great Harbaugh is and how Michigan is "primed for a championship" in 2018 as result.
D ont look at 2013. Slinky must be liberalHeading into the 2018 seasons, do the Indians own the Tigers more, or do the Buckeyes own the Wolverines more?
Bucks' ownership goes back two decades, and they have a winning percentage over that time of .800, but since they only play once a year, that's sixteen wins.
Indians' ownership of the Tigers doesn't date back nearly as far -- only about two and a half years -- but with a record of 32-12, they've celebrated twice as many wins against their "rival" in a fraction of the time.
It's a tough call do decide which Ohio team owns their Michigan counterpart more.
Discuss.
D ont look at 2013. Slinky must be liberal
Coke is Confederate trash.I put rival in quotes because clearly, there really isn't much of a rivalry in either case.
They're both like the major cola rivalries between Coke and Shasta. . .
Of course. You draw line at 2014. UnlessI don’t live in the past, shitbird.