Ok, my mistake for thinking you don't like KD. I was just trying to make sense of why you're being so hard on him.No because I also stated Curry has been to back to back Finals, Won a Finals, Back to back MVP and is the leader of his team. U watch most OKC games Westbrook seems like the leader on that team most of the time.
I dont dislike KD. LOL I actually like him a lot. You are the 1st person to say that. KD is one of my Fav players in the league. My top 5 favs in the league: 1)Rose(I will always be a Rose fan) 2) Butler (Homer picks), 3) Curry, 4)KD 5) Irving(new to my list) got a love a guy with ice in his veins. When the cavs need a boost they go to him. This was hard for me because I hate duke.
Not watching Rose every game will drop my interest but hope he does well. I will still follow him.
U just like to disagree with me. LOL Dont get me wrong Green is very important and might be one of the leaders on the team but Curry is the Main man on that team.
No he might talk the most but Curry is the leader. Just because u talk the most doesnt mean you are the leader. Dez Bryant talks the most on Dallas but he isnt the leader. (different sports I know same concept).
U just like to disagree with me. LOL Dont get me wrong Green is very important and might be one of the leaders on the team but Curry is the Main man on that team.
well LeBron has a more team friendly approach than MJ or Kobe to- but LeBron has the cojones that Durant lacks- or at least has lacked thus far.Well KD has always played in the Western Conf. He had pretty much the same results as Kobe when he was playing without a robin.
And we did see those moments taken away from Kobe- and it resulted in him & Shaq having tension & probably cost them a few seasons of winning. Knowing the outcome of that, how would that have benefitted KD in OKC?? IMO the result of that would've been KD leaving OKC long time ago.
And if this is a debate about individual talent status then why are you comparing the temperament/personality of two different types of guys? Pounding on your chest and/or chastising guys isn't always the best approach- and that isn't limited to just this situation. Have you ever heard of the sayin "you will attract more bees with honey than vinegar"??
Are we at all debating that KD doesn't have the talent that is on the same level as a Kobe or MJ? If so, I think you're wrong. He just has a different approach- a more team friendly approach- than MJ or Kobe.
Also, I will point out that LBJ struggled with being a leader until Wade denounced himself as the team leader. From that point on they were a well oiled machine in terms of chemistry on the court.Look at a Team like the Heatles.
What role would you place Udonis Haslem in?
Duncan and Garnett last Season?
draymond might be the vocal leader- but curry is by far the most important player. his spacing and shooting makes the whole thing work. Its the cornerstone and foundation of everything they do.He's the main man when it comes to best player but I think Draymond is the leader/most important player on their roster. At least the past 4 years. Maybe that changes with KD
Your points about LBJ are good- and right on target in this debate. He needed TIME and Wade had to back down as the leader before LBJ was able to put himself in the same category as MJ & Kobe. Further proof that KD might have needed to change who he plays with so he had room to grow.well LeBron has a more team friendly approach than MJ or Kobe to- but LeBron has the cojones that Durant lacks- or at least has lacked thus far.
who knows- maybe it will just take more time for Durant- but the opportunity to prove himself on the level of a Bron or Kobe or Jordan or - even the lesser guys like Kyrie, Pierce, Chauncey, Dirk or Kawhi who have all stepped up huge in big time situations in the Finals- he is gonna have to show us at some point.
maybe Durant comes through huge this postseason and is the team leader and takes GSW to the promised land and another title and he raises his profile to that of Curry and LeBron- but until he does that he just doesnt measure up- and going to GSW and a situation where many perceive it as him being "along for the ride"- it even ups the degree of difficulty for him to prove it even higher.
if after the Dallas series you told me that LeBron just doesnt have the cojones to get it done- no one could have possibly argued. Now- no one can say that. No one can ever say that Paul Pierce or Kyrie or Dirk or Chauncey shrink when the moment is the biggest on the biggest stage. you CAN say that about Durant and its not gonna change until he changes.
I would beg to differ. If you look back during the season the Warriors were able to win without Curry on the court. That wasn't the case when Dray didn't play.draymond might be the vocal leader- but curry is by far the most important player. his spacing and shooting makes the whole thing work. Its the cornerstone and foundation of everything they do.
draymond might be the vocal leader- but curry is by far the most important player. his spacing and shooting makes the whole thing work. Its the cornerstone and foundation of everything they do.
say Curry or Draymond went down the last preseason game with a torn achileesYou're wrong wiggy
say Curry or Draymond went down the last preseason game with a torn achilees
you think that team has a better chance to win more games and go further with Draymond than with Curry?
gtfooh
so you think the team would be better off with draymond than with curry if one guy got hurt for the entire year?Most important doesn't mean best. 2 different things
We already saw how the team responded when each of them was out with injuries. It doesn't take one of them being out an entire year to see the results.so you think the team would be better off with draymond than with curry if one guy got hurt for the entire year?
thats freaking insanity.
draymond might be the vocal leader- but curry is by far the most important player. his spacing and shooting makes the whole thing work. Its the cornerstone and foundation of everything they do.
so you think the team would be better off with draymond than with curry if one guy got hurt for the entire year?
thats freaking insanity.
No.
I'm not saying that.
One guy is the engine, the other drives the bus.
You kinda need both if you wanna make it to your destination.
draymond is not nearly as important to curry for that team. i totally agree- dont have to be the best player to be a leader on a team- but there is simply no debate that Curry is BOTH the best player, and most important player on that team.No.
I'm not saying that.
One guy is the engine, the other drives the bus.
You kinda need both if you wanna make it to your destination.