WiggyRuss
Well-Known Member
he would be amazing for the Sixers...they have teh $ to pay him too...Yeah, your off-injured Center can't be your teams best shooter...lol
A Redick type would be nice.
he would be amazing for the Sixers...they have teh $ to pay him too...Yeah, your off-injured Center can't be your teams best shooter...lol
A Redick type would be nice.
Here's my abridged version
interesting--- like you said- obviously an effect of defenses covering the perimeter
thats a weird list--- im looking at the teams- and the Bucks dont surprise me at #1 since their outside shooting is abysmal....
is this modified for pace? Im surprised Houston is so high up that list as well....really no rhyme or reason to it--elite teams and bad teams and mediocre teams
the Cavs are WAY down there which isnt a surprise to me.
I hope if and when the Cavs play the Warriors that McGee is on the court as much as possible.I get your point- I like that second unit with Steph, Iggy, Dray, JaVale & maybe Livingston instead of Clark.
not a surprise- you cant articulate an actual response- so this is what you default too- if i were you- i wouldnt have even attempted a response either because it would have only served to embarrass you. When individuals resort to the personal insults- you know they have been beaten.
Yup.....If they get the Lakers pick, think they'll try to deal for Deangelo Russell?he would be amazing for the Sixers...they have teh $ to pay him too...
its just not a surprise you resort to insults instead of trying to make a salient point or some kind of rebuttal- esp. cause theres just not much you can say.How is telling you to stick your novel up your ass a personal insult?
I know nothing about you, I couldn't get personal even if I wanted too
unless they're responding to tom foolery.not a surprise- you cant articulate an actual response- so this is what you default too- if i were you- i wouldnt have even attempted a response either because it would have only served to embarrass you. When individuals resort to the personal insults- you know they have been beaten.
its just not a surprise you resort to insults instead of trying to make a salient point or some kind of rebuttal- esp. cause theres just not much you can say.
i dunno.....i think dealing Russell right before he hits restricted free agency would seriously curtail his value. Id try and see how he plays with Ball. The problem is- if you have Clarkson, Russell and Ball- thats prob just too many guys who need the ball in their hands.Yup.....If they get the Lakers pick, think they'll try to deal for Deangelo Russell?
They need some vets. He doesn't fit the description....
But, if he finds his shot, he'd be a fit.
lol...just about what i expectedI can plenty, try this on for size
Heat in 6
Cleveland is a shit hole
We good now?
i have no clue-- i was just saying that i would love to see McGee on the court against the Cavs.why would he need to be now that your dominant center (Bogut) has been waived???
I hope if and when the Cavs play the Warriors that McGee is on the court as much as possible.
if Andre Iguadala is playing 38 minutes a game he is going to die. lol. Although- he did play 34 last season....a year older he is going to play more minutes? i dunno about that.The Warriors I would venture to guess would use Pachulia and McGee combined for less than 24 minutes a game, if that, playing against the Cavs in the finals.
I would venture to guess the Warriors could play any one of 11 guys. It would be heavily based on 6 guys, with the other 5 being interchangable based on changing the game up.
Steph, Klay, KD, Draymond, Iguodala - core 5 (each would likely play 38 minutes)
Bigs - Pachulia, West, McGee
Smalls - Livingston, Barnes, Clark
I'd assume something similar would happen for the Cavs too. They'd have a few core guys, but they'd be interchangable based on who's playing the best. Like how Frye got cut out of the rotation last year. I'd love to see him get major minutes in the finals.
unless they're responding to tom foolery.
if Andre Iguadala is playing 38 minutes a game he is going to die. lol. Although- he did play 34 last season....a year older he is going to play more minutes? i dunno about that.
yah Frye is highly unlikely to play against hte Warriors unless McGee is on the floor- If i were to guess a guy who is a little bit of an underdog with conventional thinking that might get some run against the Warriors is Derrick Williams.The Warriors I would venture to guess would use Pachulia and McGee combined for less than 24 minutes a game, if that, playing against the Cavs in the finals.
I would venture to guess the Warriors could play any one of 11 guys. It would be heavily based on 6 guys, with the other 5 being interchangable based on changing the game up.
Steph, Klay, KD, Draymond, Iguodala - core 5 (each would likely play 38 minutes)
Bigs - Pachulia, West, McGee
Smalls - Livingston, Barnes, Clark
I'd assume something similar would happen for the Cavs too. They'd have a few core guys, but they'd be interchangable based on who's playing the best. Like how Frye got cut out of the rotation last year. I'd love to see him get major minutes in the finals.