What's up Americanos?
Not much. How are things "across the pond"?
What's up Americanos?
If this Warriors team loses in the Finals, does that mean, I dunno, the 1979 Supersonics are a better team? The 1983 76ers? The 2007 Spurs? Again, silly.
Durant has changed a lot this last year. He no longer the humble and quiet guy he used to be.
Not much. How are things "across the pond"?
Cold, wet, still pissed off about Brexit.
Here's a question: what the hell is this 'Supporting Member Level 1/2/3" thing?
There's some way, I think it's in a thread on the Members Only board (but I haven't found it), that folks can get a paid membership that allows certain privileges (like animated avatars). I sent a PM to find out.
There's some way, I think it's in a thread on the Members Only board (but I haven't found it), that folks can get a paid membership that allows certain privileges (like animated avatars). I sent a PM to find out.
You said 'they arent the only bad team thats beat a good team this year'.
The Heat are no longer a bad team.
Whiteside scored 2 and it wasnt even a competitve game.
Pacers tonight.
Lets see how it goes.
Just found it: Supporting Memberships!
Wow, some people have paid $75 a year for a Level 3?!?
I mean hey, good for them and good for SportsHoopla but seems a bit excessive for a free message board.
They aren't that good this year, you just refuse to admit it. Name another current team under .500 that's called a good team. The Kings are 25-33 & your Heat are 26-32. So if the Heat aren't a bad team shouldn't the same be said about the Kings? After all both teams are currently sitting in 9th place in their conferences.
The Heat are interesting. They started out 11-30 or whatever which seems to suggest that they are one of the worst teams in the league.
But they've also won what? 15 of their last 17? That seems to indicate that they are pretty good. So, are they a bad team that has just gotten hot over the past 17 games and built some momentum with their 13 game win streak over mostly sub .500 teams? Or are they actually a good team that just took awhile to hit their stride?
My best guess is that they are a team that isn't as bad as their 11-30 start and not as good as their 15-2 record over the past 17 games and will ultimately settle in as a pretty average team overall.
They aren't that good this year, you just refuse to admit it. Name another current team under .500 that's called a good team. The Kings are 25-33 & your Heat are 26-32. So if the Heat are a good team shouldn't the same be said about the Kings? After all both teams are currently sitting in 9th place in their conferences.
The Heat are interesting. They started out 11-30 or whatever which seems to suggest that they are one of the worst teams in the league.
But they've also won what? 15 of their last 17? That seems to indicate that they are pretty good. So, are they a bad team that has just gotten hot over the past 17 games and built some momentum with their 13 game win streak over mostly sub .500 teams? Or are they actually a good team that just took awhile to hit their stride?
My best guess is that they are a team that isn't as bad as their 11-30 start and not as good as their 15-2 record over the past 17 games and will ultimately settle in as a pretty average team overall.
There's no question they've been playing some good basketball lately. As far as how to really describe them I agree w/ the end of your comment. They're better than their 11-30 start but I can't say they'll be making any noise in the playoffs this year if they get in. Maybe in the off season Riley can go after some players to improve the roster?
Yeah, if they make the playoffs, it'll likely be as an 8 seed and that means a short stay in the playoffs vs. Cleveland. They might beat Cleveland once in Miami (I don't think the Cavs have won in Miami since Lebron went back to the Cavs), but that's about it.
I think Riley will definitely be active in the off season. If nothing else, this turn around they've had should make them more attractive to FA's.
Their overall , season record is what it is.
If your opinion is only based on that, fine, but to me thats very tunnel visioned.
During the losing they were injury devestated, but still competitive.
Plus, mostly all new players learning how to play together.
I think average margin of loss was less then 6.
The current Heat isnt that team.
Waiters/Dragic are causing nightly havoc for everyone.
Johnson/Johnson never let you relax.
I watch alot of NBA, every team.
The Heats execution during this run is off the charts.
Always the extra pass, looking for the higher % shot.
The court spacing is near perfect.
If I were a top 4 playoff team, the last team I would want to face is this group in round 1.
Yeah, if they make the playoffs, it'll likely be as an 8 seed and that means a short stay in the playoffs vs. Cleveland. They might beat Cleveland once in Miami (I don't think the Cavs have won in Miami since Lebron went back to the Cavs), but that's about it (but how much fun would it be if the Heat pulled the upset? lol).
I think Riley will definitely be active in the off season. If nothing else, this turn around they've had should make them more attractive to FA's.
They aren't that good this year, you just refuse to admit it. Name another current team under .500 that's called a good team. The Kings are 25-33 & your Heat are 26-32. So if the Heat are a good team shouldn't the same be said about the Kings? After all both teams are currently sitting in 9th place in their conferences.