- Thread starter
- #21
NetsGotBanned21
Member
The draft chart is only as accurate as the two guys holding it feel it is and that was pre-rookie cap. Mack is probably 50/50 to be the 2nd pick. So the trade can be looked at like this by someone who views them as #1 and #2: this years #1 for this years #2, #39 and next years 1st and 2nd round pick. It just isn't going to happen IMO. Maybe if he was a franchise QB, but not in this particular case.
If I am Atl I love my spot here. There are 6 players I think are elite ignoring QB. I take whichever falls. If a QB or two goes I like my spot even more. Clowney, Mack, Watkins and any of the OTs would be great picks for them.
To me Mack is a 3-4 OLB IMO, could be dead wrong. I just don't think he fits a lot of teams scheme. Would be perfect for Houston just as Clowney would be perfect for ATL. Do I think either player could come in and play in either team? Sure, but not at their best due to scheme. I think that plays into it as well. I think even if you drop off the second 2nd round pick it still would cost ATL two first and a 2 just my thoughts.
Curious if lets say Oakland was there at 6 and could trade Houston for one of the top QBs at 1 would this trade then be justified in you opinion? If so why? I am just curious.