- Thread starter
- #1
Red_Alert
^^ Privileged ^^
A couple of days old, but WTF.
Scout.com: AP Preview: Nebraska
I personally think the primary reason for a lot of that sloppy play was because NU was getting pushed around physically on both sides of the ball. Of their 3 worst losses, they were hanging the first half when they were fresh. The second half was where they wore down and lost focus/discipline. The Ohio St game was the only game that NU didn't compete in the first half, but caught a break when Miller went downand tOSU offense went dormant. The players have bulked up so there should be improvement in durability. Question is, is that durability enough to overcome being outscored on average 21-3 in the second half of those 3 ugly losses?
To even get to the point where you're just hanging with those teams physically makes for a better game, but doesn't ensure a win. Close games come down to one or two plays/the bounce of the ball etc...
I'm sticking with no more than 3 conference losses with even 2 being a realistic expectation. The Michigan/Nebraska winner using the tiebreaker for entrance into the CCG.
I'm of course putting a lot of faith in the rhetoric from players and coaches regarding how much their focus has improved.
Scout.com: AP Preview: Nebraska
Pelini said. "Our players came out of (2011) knowing that we're going to be challenged week in and week out. You've got to be ready to go each and every Saturday, or things aren't going to go your way."
The Huskers were 36th of 120 FBS teams for penalties per game, with numerous drives imploding because of false starts and holding calls. They were 67th in turnover margin.
In a 48-17 loss to Wisconsin, the Huskers were penalized nine times for 80 yards and Martinez threw three interceptions on four possessions. In the 28-25 loss to Northwestern, the Huskers lost fumbles at the Wildcats' 6 and 19. In the 41-14 loss at Michigan, the Wolverines converted two of three fumbles into touchdowns, and a holding call wiped out a long run and forced a punt as Nebraska was trying to come back from a 17-10 deficit.
In the 30-13 Capital One Bowl loss to South Carolina, Nebraska was up 13-9 and driving for another score when Ameer Abdullah fumbled at the Gamecocks 7. Martinez was intercepted at the South Carolina 26 on the next series, leading to the
I personally think the primary reason for a lot of that sloppy play was because NU was getting pushed around physically on both sides of the ball. Of their 3 worst losses, they were hanging the first half when they were fresh. The second half was where they wore down and lost focus/discipline. The Ohio St game was the only game that NU didn't compete in the first half, but caught a break when Miller went downand tOSU offense went dormant. The players have bulked up so there should be improvement in durability. Question is, is that durability enough to overcome being outscored on average 21-3 in the second half of those 3 ugly losses?
To even get to the point where you're just hanging with those teams physically makes for a better game, but doesn't ensure a win. Close games come down to one or two plays/the bounce of the ball etc...
I'm sticking with no more than 3 conference losses with even 2 being a realistic expectation. The Michigan/Nebraska winner using the tiebreaker for entrance into the CCG.
I'm of course putting a lot of faith in the rhetoric from players and coaches regarding how much their focus has improved.