- Thread starter
- #401
Rock Strongo
My mind spits with an enormous kickback.
So what you are saying you haven't looked at one of the pictures I posted.
Not surprising.
i honestly dont understand what youre talking about
So what you are saying you haven't looked at one of the pictures I posted.
Not surprising.
When it first got announced that the Jets were looking to trade Revis, I said he'll for sure nab a first rounder. My guess was that a team like the Broncos or Falcons who were on the cusp of a title will part with a late first rounder for him
CowboyB mocked the idea that Revis would get a first rounder, and has humped it for months
Fast forward to yesteryday..... you know how CowboyB has trouble admitting when he was ridiculously wrong about something?
He'll be found guilty, but live a better life than most Americans... but behind four walls.
Full cable TV and internet service, congugal visits, a menu from which he'll choose pretty much whatever he wants, etc. Very much like Hinkley I assume.
Tell us again how Josh Johnson is so much better than Clay Buchholz... That was one of my favorite stories you told us over the winter...
:israel:
VP.. buehrle gets lit up by the yankees he's a bag of shit
Buehrle- 7ip 7H 3R 2ER 1BB 7k's
But Buehrle is trash and the yankees kill him he's garbage..
tell us how you are flat out lying about it being me saying johnson was better than buchholtz. (even though i think he is) because i haven't had a debate with a sox fan this year about johnson being better than anybody on their staff. yankees fans yes.. sox fans no.
Oh, is this the part of the season where you ask us "do you really think players x, y and z will continue performing like....." but not ask us whether one thinks those who are overacheiving will fall back to earth
i haven't had a debate with a sox fan this year about johnson being better than anybody on their staff. yankees fans yes
Yes...but you also must apply occam's Razor at some point.
Too many would have to be in the "know" in order to pull that off. Someone would be bound to spill the beans in a case that killed innocent lives..
Besides what was the Aim in doing all this? Whats the Payoff for doing this?
Not to mention its not hard to manipulate things on the internet to paint a narrative you want.. with "sources"
nope.. that's not my M.O.
Yeah, Buerhle is
The Yankees lineup against lefties is barely AA caliber outside of Cano
2 nights before Buerhle, some scrub named Patrick Corbin made them look like the 1962 Mets. 2 nights after him, Matt Moore didn't give up a single hit to a non-Cano player
So yeah, Buerhle only putting up a 3.86 ERA against a lineup which Cervelli is batting in the middle of.... is pretty terrible
How's that working out for you?
i honestly dont understand what youre talking about
Yes...but you also must apply occam's Razor at some point.
Too many would have to be in the "know" in order to pull that off. Someone would be bound to spill the beans in a case that killed innocent lives..
Besides what was the Aim in doing all this? Whats the Payoff for doing this?
Not to mention its not hard to manipulate things on the internet to paint a narrative you want.. with "sources"
Yes...but you also must apply occam's Razor at some point.
Too many would have to be in the "know" in order to pull that off. Someone would be bound to spill the beans in a case that killed innocent lives..
Besides what was the Aim in doing all this? Whats the Payoff for doing this?
Not to mention its not hard to manipulate things on the internet to paint a narrative you want.. with "sources"
I know. Because part of being an intellectual is asking questions and having doubt, you simply reject everything and anything that is inconsistent with what you want to believe.
speaking of constitutional rights, think this guy will get a fair trial?