- Thread starter
- #41
jwolt92
The voice of fuckin reason
Oh how is Jameis and his crab legs?
Good, they go well with the ring
Oh how is Jameis and his crab legs?
Good, they go well with the ring
Wow. You guys got a ring!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's Awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We got 11 so.......................
Any since the 1990s? 2000s?
Shoulda, coulda, woulda.
So no
But they do play FCS caliber teams, it's called the Pac 12.USC has never even scheduled a FCS team...
So I guess I CAN say that USC "...has never lost to an FCS school".
(If I remember correctly, UCLA & ND are the only other teams to never have played a FCS team.)
Checking in.
Sorry Michigan.
USC has never even scheduled a FCS team...
So I guess I CAN say that USC "...has never lost to an FCS school".
(If I remember correctly, UCLA & ND are the only other teams to never have played a FCS team.)
At least for Clemson, it's a way to give the smaller school an influx of revenue to help support their athletic program. FCS programs are by no means profitable for the most part, and heavily draw from the rest of the school/state to keep running. Even good programs like UNI are constantly in jeopardy financially. Clemson plays them, and they get a very large slice of the proceeds, sometimes up to a million dollars. This will represent the lion's share of their income, and helps support their athletic department so they don't have to have massive cuts or remove them altogether. South Carolina does the same thing (though they end up losing to those FCS teams). The two schedule heavily from small SC schools like Furman, Wofford, PC, and The Citadel to help support programs in state.Why the hell are y'all playing so many FCS schools? You and Clemson both..
Not a post
This is true...but USC has lost to several high school teams. That would be literally high school teams.
But, USC was never an all-girls school, so you have that going for you, which is nice.