• Have something to say? Register Now! and be posting in minutes!

NFL upholds Brady's 4 game suspension

BigKen

Day to Day
23,985
13,042
1,033
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Location
Palm Coast
Hoopla Cash
$ 500.68
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Stop trying to make sense. Facts don't work on the Hoop

I know, but I love to watch the haters refute expert information.

The best example is when MIT took 12 balls, inflated them to 13.5 PSI and placed them on a table.. Gave something like 3 or 4 or 5 men three separate oppotunties to insert a needle in the balls and deflate them to roughly 12-12.5 PSI. They did it to see how fast anyone could deflate 12 footballs. The fastest time was something like 132 seconds.

Considering that the Patriots ball attendant went into a bathroom and came out in 94 seconds, MIT said that going into the bathroom, removing 12 balls from a bag, deflating them and putting them back in the bag and walking out in 94 seconds was near impossible. Their conclusion was that he went into the bathroom, set down the bag, unzipped his pants, urinated, zipped his pants, rinsed (not washed) his hands, dried them, picked up the bag and walked out the door. Why did they say that? Because they observed over 100 men at MIT, entering the mens room carrying an object (book, notebook, backpack) urinating, wshing or rinsing hands and either drying with paper towels or using the blower. The average use was something like 87 seconds.

But when confronted with the information, on hater simply said that the ball attendant was a professional ball handler and could do the dirty deed in less time.

Facts are useless, unless the haters want to use them.
 

The Oldtimer

Older than dirt!!
52,708
5,777
533
Joined
Jun 30, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I know, but I love to watch the haters refute expert information.

The best example is when MIT took 12 balls, inflated them to 13.5 PSI and placed them on a table.. Gave something like 3 or 4 or 5 men three separate oppotunties to insert a needle in the balls and deflate them to roughly 12-12.5 PSI. They did it to see how fast anyone could deflate 12 footballs. The fastest time was something like 132 seconds.

Considering that the Patriots ball attendant went into a bathroom and came out in 94 seconds, MIT said that going into the bathroom, removing 12 balls from a bag, deflating them and putting them back in the bag and walking out in 94 seconds was near impossible. Their conclusion was that he went into the bathroom, set down the bag, unzipped his pants, urinated, zipped his pants, rinsed (not washed) his hands, dried them, picked up the bag and walked out the door. Why did they say that? Because they observed over 100 men at MIT, entering the mens room carrying an object (book, notebook, backpack) urinating, wshing or rinsing hands and either drying with paper towels or using the blower. The average use was something like 87 seconds.

But when confronted with the information, on hater simply said that the ball attendant was a professional ball handler and could do the dirty deed in less time.

Facts are useless, unless the haters want to use them.
Good comment, but how did the Pat's footballs get deflated?
 

Manster7588

I Support Law Enforcement.
46,064
13,482
1,033
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Location
Las Vegas, NV 89129
Hoopla Cash
$ 920.85
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I know, but I love to watch the haters refute expert information.

The best example is when MIT took 12 balls, inflated them to 13.5 PSI and placed them on a table.. Gave something like 3 or 4 or 5 men three separate oppotunties to insert a needle in the balls and deflate them to roughly 12-12.5 PSI. They did it to see how fast anyone could deflate 12 footballs. The fastest time was something like 132 seconds.

Considering that the Patriots ball attendant went into a bathroom and came out in 94 seconds, MIT said that going into the bathroom, removing 12 balls from a bag, deflating them and putting them back in the bag and walking out in 94 seconds was near impossible. Their conclusion was that he went into the bathroom, set down the bag, unzipped his pants, urinated, zipped his pants, rinsed (not washed) his hands, dried them, picked up the bag and walked out the door. Why did they say that? Because they observed over 100 men at MIT, entering the mens room carrying an object (book, notebook, backpack) urinating, wshing or rinsing hands and either drying with paper towels or using the blower. The average use was something like 87 seconds.

But when confronted with the information, on hater simply said that the ball attendant was a professional ball handler and could do the dirty deed in less time.

Facts are useless, unless the haters want to use them.

And I love watching Patriot fans try to pull expert information out of their asses.
 

Southieinnc

Do Your Job!
26,879
11,458
1,033
Joined
Jul 3, 2013
Location
Out of the desert!
Hoopla Cash
$ 9,623.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3

NEPatsfan

Well-Known Member
47,071
8,341
533
Joined
Nov 1, 2014
Location
Terra Firma
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
1) why won't the phone come up in hearings, you claiming theirs a agreement not to bring it up?

2) yes the phone was physically destroyed, not buying the argument that the full data is still available and neither the NFL or the judge will buy that.

3) oh please, anyone with common sense knows that was taken out of context


1. Because it's not relevant to what's being argued. The NFLPA is arguing the CBA being violated, and the phone is personal property and not part of that.

2. Actually the full data is available. And it doesn't matter what the NFL or Judge say at this point, it's not part of the case.

3. Out of context was the intent of the NFL.
 

HaroldSeattle

Administrator
Staff member
Admin
56,517
22,131
1,033
Joined
Sep 1, 2011
Location
Twin Peaks
Hoopla Cash
$ 45.14
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
1. Because it's not relevant to what's being argued. The NFLPA is arguing the CBA being violated, and the phone is personal property and not part of that.

2. Actually the full data is available. And it doesn't matter what the NFL or Judge say at this point, it's not part of the case.

3. Out of context was the intent of the NFL.

Your right, the court is going to judge whether or not the procedures follow the CBA and contract law.:yo:
It's not about whether or not TB is guilty.

So you were right and I was wrong...enjoy.
 

The Oldtimer

Older than dirt!!
52,708
5,777
533
Joined
Jun 30, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3

realityball

Well-Known Member
3,152
1,351
173
Joined
May 10, 2013
Location
North of the Yankees
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The refs checked the Pat's footballs at halftime and found they were under inflated. I don't recall the refs finding any of the Colts footballs under inflated. The article you posted doesn't tell my anything about the Colts, being caught with under inflated footballs. The Pats are the ones being charged, not the Colts.

Stop your bullshit ... you asked why weren't the colts balls "deflated."
 

The Oldtimer

Older than dirt!!
52,708
5,777
533
Joined
Jun 30, 2014
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Stop your bullshit ... you asked why weren't the colts balls "deflated."
LOL, I'm still asking, "why weren't the Colts footballs deflated during the ACCG"? The refs checked both the Pats and the Colts footballs at halftime and only found the Pats footballs were under inflated. Why is that?
 

GNG

What Me Worry?
94,596
16,740
1,033
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Location
Wisconsin
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
I feel the same, but I think the NFL wanted to make sure the punishment wasn't over the top and went with a mild suspension. They want to make sure TB doesn't have a legal leg to stand on. The NFL really wants to win this one, unlike some other battles that were just PR moves.
Everyone outside of New England thinks Brady got a mild suspension.
 

GNG

What Me Worry?
94,596
16,740
1,033
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Location
Wisconsin
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
The refs checked both the Pats and the Colts footballs at halftime and only found the Pats footballs were under inflated. Why is that?
Because they were.
 

sonnyblack65

Well-Known Member
25,678
9,766
533
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 40,000.79
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
LOL, I'm still asking, "why weren't the Colts footballs deflated during the ACCG"? The refs checked both the Pats and the Colts footballs at halftime and only found the Pats footballs were under inflated. Why is that?

OT if you read that link posted , it is showing that 3 out of the Colts balls were under the 12.5 and that the reason that they didn't check them all is because they ran out of time, so the Colts balls were deflated too. @tedman2012 small hands Luck must have hand them deflate the balls
 

realityball

Well-Known Member
3,152
1,351
173
Joined
May 10, 2013
Location
North of the Yankees
Hoopla Cash
$ 1,000.00
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
LOL, I'm still asking, "why weren't the Colts footballs deflated during the ACCG"? The refs checked both the Pats and the Colts footballs at halftime and only found the Pats footballs were under inflated. Why is that?

You got me ... you're laughing out loud but no one can hear ya ...


... you should ask yourself why that is ...
 

sonnyblack65

Well-Known Member
25,678
9,766
533
Joined
Dec 3, 2013
Hoopla Cash
$ 40,000.79
Fav. Team #1
Fav. Team #2
Fav. Team #3
Everyone outside of New England thinks Brady got a mild suspension.
Sure the biggest fine in football history and first time suspension for equipment violation, they got off easy. G&G you do crack man?
 
Top