Uhsplit
Well-Known Member
Start at the 1st page and you will find your answer.What argument can be made that Wilson is better than Luck?
Report back to us once you see the light.
Start at the 1st page and you will find your answer.What argument can be made that Wilson is better than Luck?
So what. You think Wilson would have been the only one to win a super bowl with that team? Face it, Luck has yet to be surrounded with a good team and Wilson has the best supporting cast in the league.
No one is saying Wilson isn't a good quarterback who will eventually be great. He will be. But his current role is basically Tom Brady when he was winning super bowls. Throw it 15-20 times a game, don't turn it over, and let your running game and defense win you the game.
I'm confused.
the fail mary was one of Wilson comeback wins....right or wrong? If it is one of his comeback wins then it is very relevant to the post that I was responding to when bringing up the fail mary.
I'm curious to know how many points the defense allowed in those 11 games. If I had to take a guess, I would say that in at least 8 of those 11 they probably allowed fewer than 21 points....What I'm saying basically is that in most of those comeback wins the defense was not the issue but the offense lack of scoring was.
Example #1- Last year in Carolina the defense allowed 7 points but unfortunately Wilson and the offense was only able to score 6 points in the first 3 quarters.
Example #2- In Houston last year when Wilson had absolutely nothing to do with sending the game to OT as Sherman was the one who tied it on a pick 6 late in the 4th.
Example #3- NFC title game- San Fran only had 17 points but the Seattle offense only scored 13 through 3 quarters.
Example #4- Fail Mary game....No need to explain that garbage
Should I continue? In most of Wilson comeback wins, the defense did their job but the offense was MIA for the most part.
I never said there weren't any fans at all... but say what you want. I watched the culture change here in a blink. It went from the the majority of people not giving a crap about the Seahawks... to the majority being die hard fans all of a sudden.
I love these threads. Listening to people talk about the talent around Wilson you'd think he pulled a Matt Cassel inheriting an 18-1 team or something. The Hawks were 7-9 with one of the worst passing offenses in the league when he came aboard so please don't tell me that he walked into some great situation. If it were that easy then they would have never drafted him because TJax would have been more than enough. But the reality was that he was having a hard time keeping his starting job over Clipboard Jesus because he was so bad, even with all of that great talent he apparently had to work with.
He's a troll. Best to avoid responses.This is simply not true.
Andrew Luck is the 12th to 15th best QB in the NFL. Russell Wilson is the 3rd to 5th best QB in the NFL.
And all I did was post stats and attributes. Obviously, stats are real. They are directly related to performance. And which one of those attributes favor Luck?
Saying "you are a homer" isn't an argument. It's a conclusion. But that's to be expected because thinking Luck is better than Wilson isn't supported by arguments. It is supported only as a conclusion, and an irrational one at that.
He's a troll. Best to avoid responses.
I need to remind myself of that.
Better supporting cast? Golden Tate and two undrafted guys at WR, and a completely banged up offensive line in the toughest pass rushing division in football. How is that having great things around him? There's no telling what Luck could have done with this team because they're two different QB's. But don't tell me some guy with a sub 90 career passer rating would clearly have lead the Seahawks to the Super Bowl because it's nothing but a crock of shit.
Luck has had a shitty o-line his whole career as well. Wilson has a far better defense and running game. Coaching is even but Carroll is damn good coach.
Even with the receivers, last year Luck's best receiver was Hilton. Is he better than Golden Tate? Maybe. He's not better than a healthy Percy Harvin this year. He has Wayne back, but he's coming off an ACL injury and is waay past his prime.
What argument can be made that Wilson is better than Luck?
I never said there weren't any fans at all... but say what you want. I watched the culture change here in a blink. It went from the the majority of people not giving a crap about the Seahawks... to the majority being die hard fans all of a sudden.
No one is saying Wilson isn't a good quarterback who will eventually be great. He will be. But his current role is basically Tom Brady when he was winning super bowls. Throw it 15-20 times a game, don't turn it over, and let your running game and defense win you the game.
I love these threads. Listening to people talk about the talent around Wilson you'd think he pulled a Matt Cassel inheriting an 18-1 team or something. The Hawks were 7-9 with one of the worst passing offenses in the league when he came aboard so please don't tell me that he walked into some great situation. If it were that easy then they would have never drafted him because TJax would have been more than enough. But the reality was that he was having a hard time keeping his starting job over Clipboard Jesus because he was so bad, even with all of that great talent he apparently had to work with.
I don't like if's. The Seahawks started from scratch, decided to start Wilson as a rookie, and now they're defending Super Bowl champs. Where's the if's with that?
In 2012, Luck AVERAGED 39 pass attempts per game. In 2013, Luck AVERAGED 35 pass attempts per game.
Conversely, Wilson has been asked to throw over 30 times in a game 6 times in his CAREER.
..... Seahawk fans are consumed with this massive inferiority complex.