Brandon Browner reinstated

[Sharkinva]

First though is no. Second thought is also no. Third thought... on a VERY cap friendly deal... maybe.

 

[ehb5]

haha same thoughts here. I dont trust him, i dont like him, and personally i dont think hes very good at football. It would have to be reeeeaaal cheap.

 

[skinz2winz]

haha same thoughts here. I dont trust him, i dont like him, and personally i dont think hes very good at football. It would have to be reeeeaaal cheap.

Can't say I blame you, don't care that you don't like him, and he is a good football player. Like Shark said, "a let me prove you wrong" deal and he could be our 3rd corner and solve some real issues we have in regards to signing other needed players.

 

[Skin'EmAll]

1. why would he come here? 2. How good is he without enhancement drugs?

 

[SeanTaylor21]

Like him or not, he is a good player, but like you guys said he F's up too much for me. But hey, some players learn from their mistakes and stay clean....look at Pacman. But he could come here and be a nickle and help solve some of our secondary issues.

Hail!!!

 

[gkekoa]

Like him or not, he is a good player, but like you guys said he F's up too much for me. But hey, some players learn from their mistakes and stay clean....look at Pacman. But he could come here and be a nickle and help solve some of our secondary issues.

Hail!!!

I assume you are referring to moving Hall inside in nickel situations because Browner cannot play the slot at all. You also have to question how good he is because every Seattle fan I have spoken to has said they improved when he was out.

I'm not opposed to bringing him in at the league minimum or close to it but he'd have to earn his spot.

 

[cdumler7]

I assume you are referring to moving Hall inside in nickel situations because Browner cannot play the slot at all. You also have to question how good he is because every Seattle fan I have spoken to has said they improved when he was out.

I'm not opposed to bringing him in at the league minimum or close to it but he'd have to earn his spot.

I think teams began to figure out what his weaknesses were in his game. They then started designing plays to take advantage of those weaknesses and started picking on him some. He still is a decent player but I do think being a part of a team with so many playmakers helped mask some of his deficiencies.

 

[Sharkinva]

I assume you are referring to moving Hall inside in nickel situations because Browner cannot play the slot at all. You also have to question how good he is because every Seattle fan I have spoken to has said they improved when he was out.

I'm not opposed to bringing him in at the league minimum or close to it but he'd have to earn his spot.

I think thats a bit of fan speak and hyperbole. Every fan says well the guy wasnt that good and we were better without him when a player leaves. Hell we said we were better off with Portis over Bailey when he left, which i always thought was a load of crap. IM not saying we should or shouldnt bring him in at this point. Just throwing it out there that he is available and was reinstated. And wondering what others think. We do need a corner, he would cost less than Talib by a long shot.

 

[gkekoa]

The facts support Seattle being better without Browner.


I never thought we were better with Portis than with Champ but I don't think much of RBs.


I'm all for bringing in any player for the right price. I'm cheap.


I'm all for bringing all these following trouble makers on the cheap:
Kenny Britt
Brandon Browner
Josh Gordon (maybe not even cheap)

 

[Sharkinva]

Well I guess that ends that. He is suspended for the first four games of 2014.

 

[martinez]

i dont think hes that good, average defenders can look really good playing on seattles defense.