Actually now that I look a little deeper, how the fuck did Juan Gonzalez win 2 MVPs? Either one of those could have gone to Griffey or Arod. Maybe Seattle did get overlooked some.
90's awards voters had an RBI fetish
Actually now that I look a little deeper, how the fuck did Juan Gonzalez win 2 MVPs? Either one of those could have gone to Griffey or Arod. Maybe Seattle did get overlooked some.
Yeah Juan did rack up some ribbies90's awards voters had an RBI fetish
MVP is not just a numbers award. There needs to be a narrative attached as well. And often, that narrative takes hold during the season, and it influences all the voters.Actually now that I look a little deeper, how the fuck did Juan Gonzalez win 2 MVPs? Either one of those could have gone to Griffey or Arod. Maybe Seattle did get overlooked some.
Interesting where Griffey lands in that list.Top 100 MLB players of all time
Here is another top 100 list. I love checking these out, even though this one seems all over the place.
Top 100 MLB players of all time
Here is another top 100 list. I love checking these out, even though this one seems all over the place.
Jeter at 28 and Mariano at 31......goodnight.Holy shit this is terrible
Jeter at 28 and Mariano at 31......goodnight.
As much as I love Pedro, #11 is a bit high for him and him ahead of Clemens is something. Koufax is too high. Rose is way too high and him ahead of the likes of Morgan/Speaker/Foxx is hilarious. Dave Winfield is not a top 100 player, nor are David Ortiz or Vlad. I could go on.
My problem with Koufax is while his peak is great, it's only 6 years and he didn't do a whole lot outside of that. Obviously that's not his fault, but still have to look at how his career actually played out. He's like the Kiner of pitcherskoufax is polarizing though... he may have had only 5 GREAT seasons... but it was all consecutive, and his dominance was also through the WS...
he is similar to Gehrig, where he gets a big WS boost because they are amongst the best ever...
i am not sure how i rank him yet... as i have not been stumping him yet... but i can definitely see him being in the bottom half of the top 10 pitchers of all time... i can definitely make the argument...
My problem with Koufax is while his peak is great, it's only 6 years and he didn't do a whole lot outside of that. Obviously that's not his fault, but still have to look at how his career actually played out. He's like the Kiner of pitchers
Here is how the three stack up in ERA+ seasons:no, i definitely agree... lots of all time greats with longevity have more all time great seasons... and Koufax even pitched during a bit of a dead ball era, as you can see even with his 5 great seasons there were comparable pitchers during the same time...
but he definitely gets perception bonuses for ending his career on top, and for having all his greatness in consecutive seasons... and post seasons in that window...
now that is only perception... i am sure we will see soon how we really feel about him,... but i still have Seaver, Maddux and Johnson above him, before i will even think about him...
him vs Pedro is more interesting... him vs Gibson is also pretty interesting...
Name | 200+ | 190-199 | 180-189 | 170-179 | 160-169 | 150-159 | 140-149 | 130-139 | 120-129 |
Bob Gibson | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
Sandy Koufax | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Pedro Martinez | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
This great info, but as I said before, it practically ignores IP. And that is where Pedro gets DECIMATED by the competition. He was a glorified swing man (gross overstatement, but there is a kernel of truth to it).Here is how the three stack up in ERA+ seasons:
Name 200+ 190-199 180-189 170-179 160-169 150-159 140-149 130-139 120-129 Bob Gibson 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 4 3Sandy Koufax 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1Pedro Martinez 5 0 1 0 3 0 2 0 3
Not sure its that big of a difference. Koufax threw more games per season than Martinez but their average per game is identical. Gibson went deeper on average but is 4 outs more per game that big? Average IP per pitcher:This great info, but as I said before, it practically ignores IP. And that is where Pedro gets DECIMATED by the competition. He was a glorified swing man (gross overstatement, but there is a kernel of truth to it).
4 outs more per game seems pretty bigNot sure its that big of a difference. Koufax threw more games per season than Martinez but their average per game is identical. Gibson went deeper on average but is 4 outs more per game that big? Average IP per pitcher:
Gibson - 228.1 IP per season; 7.1 IP per game
Koufax - 193.2 IP per season; 6 IP per game
Martinez - 157 IP per season; 6 IP per game
As is 35 innings in a season.4 outs more per game seems pretty big
Yeah it's very misleading for Koufax though. He was a reliever earlier in his career so of course that's gonna knock down the average. When he was on his 5 year run he was banging out complete games and threw 40 shutouts, 31 in his last 4 seasons.As is 35 innings in a season.
While Martinez was a starter his entire career.Yeah it's very misleading for Koufax though. He was a reliever earlier in his career so of course that's gonna knock down the average. When he was on his 5 year run he was banging out complete games and threw 40 shutouts, 31 in his last 4 seasons.