Mingo
Well-Known Member
I don't understand the question.Who?
I don't understand the question.Who?
Before he signed with the Chargers, CB Kristian Fulton met with the Broncos, who apparently offered him a contract ... And yesterday ( Fri April 12 )the Broncos has CB Levi Wallace in for a visit ..
This could simply be a case of having some veteran bodies in camp at the CB spot
Or, it could be an indication that the Broncos might be preparing to lose one of their CBs .... Could the Broncos be preparing to deal Pat Surtain on draft night to move up into the top 4 ?
I don't understand the question.
Yeah, also no chance of the old school D on the helmet. I really like going back to this lighter shade of blue with the orange. I hope the mountain silhouettes on the sleeves don't look cheesy. Everything I've read tells me that I'm not going to be happy with the new unis.
I don’t hate the Rockies, I despise their owner and management - and wish the very worst for them. I’m not a fan of tinkering with things that are broken. They just need to be replaced. So, the worse the team does (I’m hoping for a historic, embarrassing number of losses) the better chance there is a housecleaning.George hates the Rockies so he is pretending like he has never heard of them.![]()
Calm downLMAO. SO dumb. Yeah, we are interested in depth CB's with starting experience because we are going to trade Patrick Surtain. Who writes this crap anyway? Anymore, anyone can write an article on the web.
Broncos have shown interest in Fulton, Wallace and Witherspoon. I would rank them Wallace, Fulton, Witherspoon to be honest. It is simply for a CB depth and a guy who could start if needed. Has ZERO to do with trying to move Surtain. We need another CB weather that is in the draft or a move like one of these 3. If anything it sorta tells me we may not be looking to draft CB early and even if we do and end up with 5 good CB's because we draft BPA then good for us.
I also think we may be holding off to sign a guy like Wallace for if we don't take a CB early..
Has nothing to do with Surtain. You have to love the ability for anyone to write a dumb story and make something out of nothing nowadays.
Calm down
I second the CALM DOWN sentimentLMAO. SO dumb. Yeah, we are interested in depth CB's with starting experience because we are going to trade Patrick Surtain. Who writes this crap anyway? Anymore, anyone can write an article on the web.
Broncos have shown interest in Fulton, Wallace and Witherspoon. I would rank them Wallace, Fulton, Witherspoon to be honest. It is simply for a CB depth and a guy who could start if needed. Has ZERO to do with trying to move Surtain. We need another CB weather that is in the draft or a move like one of these 3. If anything it sorta tells me we may not be looking to draft CB early and even if we do and end up with 5 good CB's because we draft BPA then good for us.
I also think we may be holding off to sign a guy like Wallace for if we don't take a CB early..
Has nothing to do with Surtain. You have to love the ability for anyone to write a dumb story and make something out of nothing nowadays.
Calm down. Nothing about DC's post involved you starting a conversation or debate. His was a response to the article, nothing more. You took this personally.I second the CALM DOWN sentiment
Your reaction tells me that you saw the same article that I was referring too ..
There is nothing "DUMB" about passing along a scenario - no matter how far-fetched - to spark some conversation during the long offseason
Is it likely ?? NO ... Is trading Surtain to move up possible ?? .. YES
DC, I love you, but there are times when you come across like the only person who has any insight, and anything that deviates from your view is to be dismissed without question
I love this forum, and that comes from the OPINIONS here - and the conversation that comes from it
Shooting down conversation - no matter what the thought - is something far worse than "dumb" ...
If we have gotten to the point where you are calling every post that doesn't align with your views "DUMB", than this forum has become garbage
a simple "highly unlikely" with your thoughts on why would fine .. Conversation is what it is all about
But becoming unhinged like a fat girl reading Playboy is a bit unnecessary
I second the CALM DOWN sentiment
Your reaction tells me that you saw the same article that I was referring too ..
There is nothing "DUMB" about passing along a scenario - no matter how far-fetched - to spark some conversation during the long offseason
Is it likely ?? NO ... Is trading Surtain to move up possible ?? .. YES
DC, I love you, but there are times when you come across like the only person who has any insight, and anything that deviates from your view is to be dismissed without question
I love this forum, and that comes from the OPINIONS here - and the conversation that comes from it
Shooting down conversation - no matter what the thought - is something far worse than "dumb" ...
If we have gotten to the point where you are calling every post that doesn't align with your views "DUMB", than this forum has become garbage
a simple "highly unlikely" with your thoughts on why would fine .. Conversation is what it is all about
But becoming unhinged like a fat girl reading Playboy is a bit unnecessary
Calm down. Nothing about DC's post involved you starting a conversation or debate. His was a response to the article, nothing more.
My White Sox will give the Rockies a year run for their money in the Bad owner category and crappy team category.I don’t hate the Rockies, I despise their owner and management - and wish the very worst for them. I’m not a fan of tinkering with things that are broken. They just need to be replaced. So, the worse the team does (I’m hoping for a historic, embarrassing number of losses) the better chance there is a housecleaning.
Things were looking so promising for them for a short time.My White Sox will give the Rockies a year run for their money in the Bad owner category and crappy team category.
I don’t follow the White Sox, but do they have anything in the pipeline? Playing at altitude, the Rockies will never attract FA pitchers unless they pay double the going rate. They claim to be a draft and develop team, but there are no arms you can point me to anywhere in the minors that have a chance to lift them. The hapless organization also is hopeless for fans. I refuse to go to games, although it’s a beautiful outing.My White Sox will give the Rockies a year run for their money in the Bad owner category and crappy team category.
The Sox have some suspects in the minors - 3 in the top 100.I don’t follow the White Sox, but do they have anything in the pipeline? Playing at altitude, the Rockies will never attract FA pitchers unless they pay double the going rate. They claim to be a draft and develop team, but there are no arms you can point me to anywhere in the minors that have a chance to lift them. The hapless organization also is hopeless for fans. I refuse to go to games, although it’s a beautiful outing.
Be a Cubs fan. We'll take you and any other disgruntled Rockies fans.I don’t follow the White Sox, but do they have anything in the pipeline? Playing at altitude, the Rockies will never attract FA pitchers unless they pay double the going rate. They claim to be a draft and develop team, but there are no arms you can point me to anywhere in the minors that have a chance to lift them. The hapless organization also is hopeless for fans. I refuse to go to games, although it’s a beautiful outing.
How did you know that I was referring to an article ?? .. You didn't .. unless you read the same one, right ??Relax Lucas. You're taking this way too personal. Not everything is about you. I didn't call the post dumb. Calling someone a name and making fun of fat girl isn't the way to go here. You took this way too personal. It isn't about you.
I am speaking about the article, nothing to do with you. You didn't write this or say this.