Jaylan fergeson DE la tech..someone said
All time sack leader..in D1== ncaa
So I watched so youtube film
So I will change my draft to
#1
Zack Allen DE..boston collage...and put him at LDE..or were the TE is
Then trade for a low 2 round or high 3rd round to get
Fergeson for...RDE
Then the Seahawks could still move Clark
Around for even more pressure
Then use the Seahawks #3rd round pick
On miles boykin...WR..notre dame
Then # 4 Renell wren..dt arizona state...if he is still there
There are not a lot of picks after that
So fire away with some secondary guys
And maybe a nickel guy
Boom...revamped D line
And a 6=4wr who can jump ...and run a 4.7..to4.2..40
.
I like you. Welcome aboard
I like you. Welcome aboard
If they go
Offencive line ...in first round ..Andre dillard..LT..wash state is the guy
There is scutterbug ( I think I spelt it right) going around that Jordy Nelson is planning on visiting the Seahawks.
Would be a nice Rotation piece if he signs
Thanks..i usually post on the mariners
And ncaa potential prospects for them
And an ulmax opinion on them ( the mariners)
But I have always been a Seahawks fan sense they started..in they70,s..lol
Jordy Nelson would be ok
but cuz i like a fb who can go down into
A te..and block or catch
So he will be in motion at times..going from pro set to single back...to confuse
The defence
So I still like miles Boykin as well
As aposed to a traditional TE
..as Walter foosball has.
As the hawkes first pick
And..LT brown already has 12 years in
That is a good case to be made for drafting a LT
Yeah ok then...i change my mind to Zack
Allen Boston collage
Which could move Clark to the other side...or not
I'm ok with Pete getting lower lvl saftys..cuz
He is the coach..and a secondary caoch as well
He made the first
leagon of boom
.he will make another
Second leagon of boom
I definitely feel the O can be better this coming season, especially if Moore takes another step (he faded at the end of '18 but still think he is on the upswing), Dissly is g2g, Baldwin comes in 100%, etc.
I have placed decreasing value on the WR position as I've become older, especially in the salary cap era. Line up the top 10 highest paid WRs and tally up the SBs, and you'll see why. I just don't think they really help you win (the big money guys), at least relative to a handful of other positions. And that's not to say I wasn't excited about the trades for Percy Harvin and Jimmy Graham, but those are 2 pretty good examples why moves that like that are a bad idea. Harvin actually seemed for a minute like it was going to work, but we would have been much better off as we were. And even though Graham was actually pretty productive here and worked out better (my opinion) than most people think, it still was a move that pulled us away from our 2012/13 identity on offense....and we probably would have been better off not making that trade. I just don't think you need to pay big money or use top picks on WRs if you have a truly elite QB. Maybe you do if you have Andy Dalton, but RW is good enough to win with a generally average group of targets.
Good points. With the WR position, I'm just mostly concerned about depth. In an age where a 3 WR set is relatively common, I just think it's prudent to have depth due to formation requirements and in the case of injuries.
When I listed WR as the 5th need for the team, I wasn't advocating an early round pick or a big splash in free agency. It was more of a depth thing. Hawks seem to be pretty set at most other positions. I do really like the idea of Jermaine Kearse though. He has good chemistry with Wilson and the Hawks seem to thrive the best with WRs who are able to have a good feel for coming back to the ball when Russell Wilson scrambles.
Kind of a tangent, but I think one of the reasons the Seahawks offense/run game was so successful last season is because with teams moving more towards building a defense that stops the run, that gives the Seahawks a big personnel advantage when they're running these heavy sets against teams that are deploying defensive players whose skill sets are more oriented towards pass rushing/coverage.
Good points. With the WR position, I'm just mostly concerned about depth. In an age where a 3 WR set is relatively common, I just think it's prudent to have depth due to formation requirements and in the case of injuries.
When I listed WR as the 5th need for the team, I wasn't advocating an early round pick or a big splash in free agency. It was more of a depth thing. Hawks seem to be pretty set at most other positions. I do really like the idea of Jermaine Kearse though. He has good chemistry with Wilson and the Hawks seem to thrive the best with WRs who are able to have a good feel for coming back to the ball when Russell Wilson scrambles.
Kind of a tangent, but I think one of the reasons the Seahawks offense/run game was so successful last season is because with teams moving more towards building a defense that stops the run, that gives the Seahawks a big personnel advantage when they're running these heavy sets against teams that are deploying defensive players whose skill sets are more oriented towards pass rushing/coverage.
I have placed decreasing value on the WR position as I've become older, especially in the salary cap era. Line up the top 10 highest paid WRs and tally up the SBs, and you'll see why. I just don't think they really help you win (the big money guys), at least relative to a handful of other positions. And that's not to say I wasn't excited about the trades for Percy Harvin and Jimmy Graham, but those are 2 pretty good examples why moves that like that are a bad idea. Harvin actually seemed for a minute like it was going to work, but we would have been much better off as we were. And even though Graham was actually pretty productive here and worked out better (my opinion) than most people think, it still was a move that pulled us away from our 2012/13 identity on offense....and we probably would have been better off not making that trade. I just don't think you need to pay big money or use top picks on WRs if you have a truly elite QB. Maybe you do if you have Andy Dalton, but RW is good enough to win with a generally average group of targets.
Idk on the amount of money the Seahawks have to spend on free agents
But there are still enough..free agents
To help them
Note..im a bit behind on the Seahawks
I have been paying to much attention
To ncaa baseball...lololol
There can be no doubt
they need to secure A LT of the future(Dillard wash st would be ok to start with while they still have brown..cuz he could play guard as
Well)
They need to draft DE..one or two..for
Money reasons as well