2018-2019 NBA Regular Season Thread

[trojanfan12]

10% roster construction!!!

totally ignoring 3 pt shooting in a league whre 3 pt shooting is immensely important when they KNEW they had bad 3 pt shooting?

pretty much ignoring rebounding and defense in the front court?

thinking JaVale Mcgee and Tyson Chandler were legit options

cmon now.

everyone nad their brother knew 3 pt shooting would be a huge detriment to the team the way they built it before the first ball was ever thrown up.

10% roster construction because we don't know who they offered that was looking for bigger roles and this was never the roster they were looking to contend with anyway. If it were, it would be a much bigger piece of the pie.

Minus the injuries and AD crap, this roster, despite it's construction, was looking like a solid playoff team which was all that was expected when they didn't get another max level guy.

 

[dtgold88]

The difference is that everyone, including Lebron, knew that they were punting as soon as they didn't get a 2nd guy. Once that happened, it was all about next season.

Yes, everyone expected the playoffs as long as Lebron stayed healthy. But that was pretty much it and more about Lebron's greatness and the potential of the kids than anything else.

In Cleveland, they already had the 2nd guy in Kyrie and brought in a 3rd when they traded for Love. So, of course they wouldn't have gotten away with punting any of his seasons.

Cleveland had no cap space nor assets and did better in their offseasons than the one LA just had.

 

[dtgold88]

10% roster construction because we don't know who they offered that was looking for bigger roles and this was never the roster they were looking to contend with anyway. If it were, it would be a much bigger piece of the pie.

Minus the injuries and AD crap, this roster, despite it's construction, was looking like a solid playoff team which was all that was expected when they didn't get another max level guy.

That's the excuse for picking up no one who could help, even with another max spot available to fill? Because "we don't know who they offered....."?

 

[Mecca]

The difference is that everyone, including Lebron, knew that they were punting as soon as they didn't get a 2nd guy. Once that happened, it was all about next season.

Yes, everyone expected the playoffs as long as Lebron stayed healthy. But that was pretty much it and more about Lebron's greatness and the potential of the kids than anything else.

In Cleveland, they already had the 2nd guy in Kyrie and brought in a 3rd when they traded for Love. So, of course they wouldn't have gotten away with punting any of his seasons.

I mean...

Go back and look at the list of free agents last Summer.

I guess they could have gone after Redick or the other Curry boy.

Otherwise, were they gonna sink their capspace by overpaying a guy like Lavine?

The Bulls probably would have matched.

Cp3, George, Capela and a injured Boogie.

Who else was out there that would moved the needle?

And, puhleeeaaasssseee...

Let's not rehash the Randle conversation.

They had no shot at two max spots had they kept him.

 

[WiggyRuss]

10% roster construction because we don't know who they offered that was looking for bigger roles and this was never the roster they were looking to contend with anyway. If it were, it would be a much bigger piece of the pie.

Minus the injuries and AD crap, this roster, despite it's construction, was looking like a solid playoff team which was all that was expected when they didn't get another max level guy.

if thats the stance you are taking i DEF dont ever want to hear how "come to LA to play for a winner on the prestigious Lakers with LeBron" is a huge selling point ever again.

 

[Mecca]

That's the excuse for picking up no one who could help, even with another max spot available to fill? Because "we don't know who they offered....."?

Who would they have picked up?

I don't remember this being a deep free agent class.

 

[Mecca]

if thats the stance you are taking i DEF dont ever want to hear how "come to LA to play for a winner on the prestigious Lakers with LeBron" is a huge selling point ever again.

LA market is still a selling point for the Lakers.

The question is:

Does playing with LeBron lessen it.

We will find out this Summer.

The more I think about it, the more I believe they will get Butler.

If they get a good pick and package it with the Kiddie Corps for Davis, this is a completely different conversation.

Heck, they could get Butler, keep the children and bring in a guy like Deandre Jordan.

 

[trojanfan12]

All of this.

Do you think he has done some harm to the Lakers chances in free agency?

I don't think guys like Kawhi, Klay, Boogie would care if they wanted to come to LA.

Durant?

Probably.

He's so fucking thin skinned

It's hard to say if he has done damage to their chances or not.

On the one hand, guys at that level know that they aren't going to be included in any trade talks if Lebron decides to try to play GM again. So, in that regard, I doubt it.

On the other hand, there was speculation before Lebron came to the Lakers that some of the top FA's don't want to play with him because Lebron gets all the credit when they win and little of the blame when they don't.

But then, AD looks like he does want to play with him.

Even this off-season it will be hard to know because guys like Kawhi and Klay have plenty of non-Lebron related reasons to not come to the Lakers.

 

[trojanfan12]

Dude....I just noticed your signature line.

Lmfao

lol

Saw that awhile back, can't remember where, and decided I liked it. Haven't found anything better to replace it with.

 

[trojanfan12]

Cleveland had no cap space nor assets and did better in their offseasons than the one LA just had.

I don't know. I'd say getting the best player available makes for a pretty good off-season. Especially since no one thought they were going to.

 

[dtgold88]

Who would they have picked up?

I don't remember this being a deep free agent class.

I know you don't care to have it rehashed, but what about not losing Randle for next to nothing if they were punting on the season anyway? And if the reason not to ius to have a cleaner cap next year Randle on his deal might be among the easiest guys in the entire league to move. 1 yr, 9 mil and a stud?

But what about JJ Redick? Make a deal for Korver? Ariza or Joe Harris maybe?

 

[dtgold88]

I don't know. I'd say getting the best player available makes for a pretty good off-season. Especially since no one thought they were going to.

My mistake...should have said adding to a team with Lebron (was referring to their previous 2 seasons).

 

[trojanfan12]

That's the excuse for picking up no one who could help, even with another max spot available to fill? Because "we don't know who they offered....."?

You realize that this isn't a fantasy league, right? Just because they make an offer, doesn't mean a guy has to accept it.

If a player like. for example Ellington, was looking for a bigger role than he would have had with the Lakers, why would he sign with them?

We have know idea who else the Lakers spoke to. As soon as they didn't get another max player, saving cap space became more important than who they signed as 1 year roster fillers.

 

[WiggyRuss]

LA market is still a selling point for the Lakers.

The question is:

Does playing with LeBron lessen it.

We will find out this Summer.

The more I think about it, the more I believe they will get Butler.

If they get a good pick and package it with the Kiddie Corps for Davis, this is a completely different conversation.

Heck, they could get Butler, keep the children and bring in a guy like Deandre Jordan.

that waht i told my buddy last night--- that i thought htey would get Butler.

and you know i hate butler with a passion

id rather have middleton or beal SO much more.

 

[LAD]

Not as funny as those who talk today about a lake catching fire that happened 50 years ago....and wasn't a lake.

I appreciate your effort to compare the two, but these are not same same examples. See, the lake....excuse me, river actually did catch on fire - this we know. But....smog is NOT hovering over every city in Cali.

Have you hired someone yet to keep track of your dumb posts so your future dumb posts don't bite you in the ass later?

 

[Mecca]

I know you don't care to have it rehashed, but what about not losing Randle for next to nothing if they were punting on the season anyway? And if the reason not to ius to have a cleaner cap next year Randle on his deal might be among the easiest guys in the entire league to move. 1 yr, 9 mil and a stud?

But what about JJ Redick? Make a deal for Korver? Ariza or Joe Harris maybe?

If I remember correctly, Randle's cap hold was a problem.

Add in the fact that he didn't want to be there.

As for Ariza, Korver...

You have to have a willing trade partner.

I live in Arizona.

Sarver took a ton of Shit for freeing Tyson to sign with the Lakers.

He was not going to compound the situation by handing them Ariza unless it was a HEIST of a haul coming back in return.

 

[WiggyRuss]

I know you don't care to have it rehashed, but what about not losing Randle for next to nothing if they were punting on the season anyway? And if the reason not to ius to have a cleaner cap next year Randle on his deal might be among the easiest guys in the entire league to move. 1 yr, 9 mil and a stud?

But what about JJ Redick? Make a deal for Korver? Ariza or Joe Harris maybe?

that the thing

good GMS get stuff done

bad GMs use excuses

I mean- Jeff Green signed a veteran min. deal on the freaking Wizards.

Nik Stauskas was out there in free agency.

Tony Parker took a 2 year 10M dollar deal to backup Kemba

Mbah a Moute took a 1 year 4.5M dollar deal- exaclty wha they gave Stephenson.

Brook Lopez got EXACTLY what they gave Beasley

Ellington got HALF of what the Lakers gave KCP

Rudy GAy got basically exactly what Rondo got

 

[WiggyRuss]

If I remember correctly, Randle's cap hold was a problem.

Add in the fact that he didn't want to be there.

As for Ariza, Korver...

You have to have a willing trade partner.

I live in Arizona.

Sarver took a ton of Shit for freeing Tyson to sign with the Lakers.

He was not going to compound the situation by handing them Ariza unless it was a HEIST coming back in return.

Cavs did really well for Korver--- got 2 2nd rounders and Burks who was fundamental to getting the Houston 1st rounder

Oubre has looked great with the Suns.

 

[trojanfan12]

if thats the stance you are taking i DEF dont ever want to hear how "come to LA to play for a winner on the prestigious Lakers with LeBron" is a huge selling point ever again.

Why would a guy who is looking for a 1 year deal so that he can hopefully turn it into a bigger, multi-year deal want to go to a team that is going to give him less playing time?

For those guys, it's not about playing for the Lakers or with Lebron. It's about playing where they can get the most minutes and earn a better contract.

 

[Mecca]

that waht i told my buddy last night--- that i thought htey would get Butler.

and you know i hate butler with a passion

id rather have middleton or beal SO much more.

Both are younger and have better attitudes.

Jimmy is better than Beal defensively.

Not enough to put up with his mood swings.