CJH9972
Rivals' DTP2
Ummmm, there are lots of quality SoS metrics out there. The SoS metric you mention is not new, it's probably one of the oldest SoS methods out there because it's so simple, but it's extremely flawed and can be demonstrated as such.
Because stats used improperly are LIES. They are not objective as you seem to claim, they are LIES. The formula you are wanting to use try to suggest that all 6-6 teams are equal, and anyone with a little common sense knows this is bullshit. So to base anything on such a formula is to be a system on lies.
You can sit here and say whatever you want, but everyone who matters know this(which is why so many other better formulas exist) and by proposing such systems you only highlight your own ignorance on the topic and why nobody should take you seriously.
The problem is that you think equal as a matter of rule must be equal as a matter of perception about ability. I make no claim that all 6-6 teams are equally good teams just as conferences and pro sports don't claim all teams are equally good teams even though wins versus the best and worst count the same in the standings. The only lies come from those who think any stats system is making a subjective claim when that is precisely what it is not doing. If teams played by my rules, every higher placed team is simply more accomplished according to what those rules value. Nothing more and nothing less. You may oppose my idea because it doesn't validate your perceptions about the very things it is meant to ignore, but its results are not making a false claim about those things.