TrustMeIamRight
Well-Known Member
We are talking about the OC. You obviously are talking about something else.We do.
We are talking about the OC. You obviously are talking about something else.We do.
We are talking about the OC. You obviously are talking about something else.
That's why it's still a great rivalry...Let’s get real here you can talk shit but even with our issues Auburn has had more success against Alabama than anyone else.
Saban hasn’t ever beaten an Auburn team with 9 or more wins. We’re not laying down like UT, LSU and UGA.
Auburn will get their shit together eventually and that won’t be fun for you when it happens.
They are only good by your definition.
9-4 Auburn beat Saban. Good Auburn team.
8-5 Auburn team lost to Saban. Bad Auburn team.
BAHAHAHAHAHA
Let’s get real here you can talk shit but even with our issues Auburn has had more success against Alabama than anyone else.
Saban hasn’t ever beaten an Auburn team with 9 or more wins. We’re not laying down like UT, LSU and UGA.
Auburn will get their shit together eventually and that won’t be fun for you when it happens.
How old are you?If 9+ wins is having their shit together, Auburn hasn’t had their shit together on a regular basis in my lifetime.
How old are you?
The distinction only started late in Tuberville’s tenure.
I’ve been around for 53 Iron Bowls.
The whole “when AU wins 9+ games” thing underscores that it happens in a minority of years. In Saban’s tenure, AU is 99-57. That includes outliers of 14-0 and 3-9. Either way, they essentially are an 8-win team on average (with a median of 8 wins as well).
For comparison, they were 85-40 in 10 seasons under Tuberville, 49-20-1 in 6 seasons under Bowden/Oliver, and 99-39-4 in 12 years under Dye. Each of those averaged 8 wins/year. (I will spare Barfield’s miserable numbers.)
Granted 8 wins/year meant something WAY different in Dye’s day. But 8 wins/year has been a pretty consistent average for AU going back 50 years. Not sure why some think more is a reasonable expectation just because they occasionally catch lightning in a bottle.
Since the conference split into divisions in 92 the West has been won/tied:I’ve been around for 53 Iron Bowls.
The whole “when AU wins 9+ games” thing underscores that it happens in a minority of years. In Saban’s tenure, AU is 99-57. That includes outliers of 14-0 and 3-9. Either way, they essentially are an 8-win team on average (with a median of 8 wins as well).
For comparison, they were 85-40 in 10 seasons under Tuberville, 49-20-1 in 6 seasons under Bowden/Oliver, and 99-39-4 in 12 years under Dye. Each of those averaged 8 wins/year. (I will spare Barfield’s miserable numbers.)
Granted 8 wins/year meant something WAY different in Dye’s day. But 8 wins/year has been a pretty consistent average for AU going back 50 years. Not sure why some think more is a reasonable expectation just because they occasionally catch lightning in a bottle.
Since the conference split into divisions in 92 the West has been won/tied:
Alabama - 14
Auburn - 9
LSU - 8
Arkansas - 4
Miss State - 1
Ole Miss - 1
We've done fine in the toughest division in football. Plus in 1993 we were undefeated and one should be added to Auburn and one taken from Alabama. Nick's run has been incredible but Auburn has done fine for the majority of the time since 1992 and we had a great run in the 80's winning/tie the SEC 4 times to Bama's 2 times (Georgia had 3 wins).
Nothing to be ashamed of.
Nothing to be ashamed of.
You’re a mean girl.Except that whole you're Auburn thing.
You’re a mean girl.
ice coldI'm just going to leave this right here...