Was Saturday worse than when they decided to let in Rutgers and UMD? Probably a toss-up as to worst day ever
The way those two teams play on the field means nothing compared the money being brought in. At the end of the day, that's what matters.How would adding two teams that help bring the conference more money be a bad day? Regardless of how awful they are, they still helped everyone else in the conference get PAID.
Silly Turkey
I'm still disappointed the BigTen added Maryland & Rutgers.
Bubububububutttt TV sets.Was Saturday worse than when they decided to let in Rutgers and UMD? Probably a toss-up as to worst day ever
The way those two teams play on the field means nothing compared the money being brought in. At the end of the day, that's what matters.
The real question is - How good is this Buffalo team that beat Temple by 7? They might beat USC by 6-7 TDs.How bad is Texas if they lost to this pathetic Maryland team?
how bad is USC if they lost to the same Texas team?
Buffalo heading to the playoffs.The real question is - How good is this Buffalo team that beat Temple by 7? They might beat USC by 6-7 TDs.
I mean, probablyBuffalo heading to the playoffs.
Adding Rutgers and MD was a no brainier. Not only for revenue purposes, but also for two automatic conference wins for anybody of worth in that conference. Playing a 9 game conference schedule doesn't mean much when those extra games are versus MD and Rutgers. On top of a conference with NW, Illinois, Purdue, Nebraska(for this year anyway) and IU and Minnesota.
The rundown you just did, you can do that with any conference. There's no conference out there that's filled with juggernauts. Basically all of them are half crap.Adding Rutgers and MD was a no brainier. Not only for revenue purposes, but also for two automatic conference wins for anybody of worth in that conference. Playing a 9 game conference schedule doesn't mean much when those extra games are versus MD and Rutgers. On top of a conference with NW, Illinois, Purdue, Nebraska(for this year anyway) and IU and Minnesota.
Winning doesn't matter. It is all about revenue, revenue, revenue. Whoever generates the most revenue is the best. Piss on the CFP playoffs.
As examples, I offer up Texas A&M and the University of Texas. They are the bestest. Don't win shit but generate the most revenue. Rich agnuts and rusty cows.
Minus the fact temple and Kansas have already lost to an fcs team. Lmao.
The rundown you just did, you can do that with any conference. There's no conference out there that's filled with juggernauts. Basically all of them are half crap.
So do the crap B1G teams. What's your point?Agreed, but even the crap teams usually beat MAC teams, Sun Belt teams and bad AAC teams.
They won, and beat the shit out of world beaters Oregon and Bama.
So do the crap B1G teams. What's your point?