SteelersPride
Well-Known Member
So what against bad competition, ur making excuses for himhe had a bad team
So what against bad competition, ur making excuses for himhe had a bad team
As follows year to year at Louisville - 54.7%, 56.2%, and 59.1%. That's improvement, but imo not much improvement. His career best of last year was good for 55th in the nation last year. Some of the others, Darnold, 63.1% last year and Rosen, 62.6% last year, 60.9% for his career aren't much better.
Not mobile QBs, homey. Running QBs. And its because running QBs have shown historically to be not very good passing QBs, unable to develop a necessary pocket presence, get hurt too much. I can only think of three that have sustained a high level of successs for a significant period of time. Steve Young, who developed into a great QB who could pass from the pocket, and Russell Wilson, who is arguably the best and smartest running QB to ever play the game and Cam who is a freak of nature.
There have been some that had success for a small window of time. Kordell, Randall, Vick, and Jim Harbaugh with the Colts for a season. Some might even include Tim Tebow and I wouldn't get mad or disagree too vehemently. Maybe there are more, but I can't think of anymore.
Oh, and I should say. Stats and stats alone aren't the measure of whether or not a college QB will become a good/great NFL QB. Oklahoma QBs always seem to put up great numbers. Who was the last great QB from Oklahoma? Troy Aikman, perhaps.
he had a bad team
Allen is more the drop back QB so he would more closely fit. As I said I am not advocating for either guy.
So what against bad competition, ur making excuses for him
Again, what about last yearIf Peyton Manning has WRs that can’t get open, how do you think he would do? The defenses Allen played against were far superior to the team playing around him.
So what against bad competition, ur making excuses for him
Yes are u really arguing pure media biasThe guy is a top 6 pick. Are you really arguing this? Could go #$1 overall. lol
The guy is a top 6 pick. Are you really arguing this? Could go #$1 overall. lol
AllenWait.. who are we saying is a top six pick?? Allen or Jackson??
Cousins is best I agree
As follows year to year at Louisville - 54.7%, 56.2%, and 59.1%. That's improvement, but imo not much improvement. His career best of last year was good for 55th in the nation last year. Some of the others, Darnold, 63.1% last year and Rosen, 62.6% last year, 60.9% for his career aren't much better.
Not mobile QBs, homey. Running QBs. And its because running QBs have shown historically to be not very good passing QBs, unable to develop a necessary pocket presence, get hurt too much. I can only think of three that have sustained a high level of successs for a significant period of time. Steve Young, who developed into a great QB who could pass from the pocket, and Russell Wilson, who is arguably the best and smartest running QB to ever play the game and Cam who is a freak of nature.
There have been some that had success for a small window of time. Kordell, Randall, Vick, and Jim Harbaugh with the Colts for a season. Some might even include Tim Tebow and I wouldn't get mad or disagree too vehemently. Maybe there are more, but I can't think of anymore.
The guy is a top 6 pick. Are you really arguing this? Could go #$1 overall. lol
both guys pass under 60 and the 2.9 % difference is stupid to debate , neither is more accurate what allen showed at the sr bowl is he needs some work on touch and processing and it improved over the week
so far the same issue had coming into last season are the same ones he left with , accuracy , processing , manipulating defenders in the pass game , recognizing pro defenses . talent he has however you will have to change our offense to fit jackson in because he doesnt fit our timing based precision read offense
Why can't Jackson fit a timing and precision based offense but Allen can?