- Thread starter
- #61
bksballer89
Most Popular Member
Wrong thread dude.
My bad. Will post in the correct thrad
Wrong thread dude.
LOL @ your infatuation with Simmons and Embiid.
It has long been reported that LeBron won't sign with a rebuilding team, and Philly certainly qualifies with Fultz being such an unknown commodity. At least in Cleveland he's the undisputed #1 priority in the organization. The only scenario I would see for LeBron ending up in Philly would be if his relationship with Dan Gilbert is so strained to the point where a separation is absolutely necessary.
It has long been reported that LeBron won't sign with a rebuilding team,
According to what's been reported, there are 4 teams on Lebron's list.
The Cavs, Lakers, Sixers and Rockets.
If he goes to Lakers or Sixers, he will be bringing another max guy with him. Thus, they will no longer be rebuilding.
You do realize that he HAS to deny it, right?
If he confirms it, it's all he's going to be asked about and all anyone will be talking about. It will be a distraction for his team because they'll be asked about it too.
That, or it's just you pinning your hopes that it's true for the simple fact that it's the only way your team will be relevant again/
Lol. I don't really care if Lebron comes to the Lakers or not.
LOL at your inability to be objective and see the big picture.
The draft lottery will determine a lot of things. If that Brooklyn pick ends up winning the lottery, for instance, he 100% ain't going anywhere.
I'm sure.
and THIS, ladies and gents, is the woman who said me and Heatles had sick minds...
LOL @ your infatuation with Simmons and Embiid.
It has long been reported that LeBron won't sign with a rebuilding team, and Philly certainly qualifies with Fultz being such an unknown commodity. At least in Cleveland he's the undisputed #1 priority in the organization. The only scenario I would see for LeBron ending up in Philly would be if his relationship with Dan Gilbert is so strained to the point where a separation is absolutely necessary.
So basically, because I'm supposed to believe that only teams with what you personally label as "superstar" players have a chance to win, yet think otherwise...Means I'm not thinking objectively.
OK, then.
And you claim to be a basketball coach in real life...I just wonder what you teach your so-called players if you don't think they have a chance without that so-called "superstar" player.
LOL @ your infatuation with Simmons and Embiid.
It has long been reported that LeBron won't sign with a rebuilding team, and Philly certainly qualifies with Fultz being such an unknown commodity. At least in Cleveland he's the undisputed #1 priority in the organization. The only scenario I would see for LeBron ending up in Philly would be if his relationship with Dan Gilbert is so strained to the point where a separation is absolutely necessary.
I have no idea where Lebron is going to go but to call the Sixers a rebuilding team is.... odd.
There are likely going to be a 45+ win team with their 2 best players being effectively rookies. Arguing that they are a rebuilding team because their No. 1 pick this year, who hasn't played any games, is still unknown is just strange.
If I were forced to put some odds on it I would put the odds at something like this.
3-2 - Stays in Cleveland
2-1 - Goes to the Lakers
4 - 1 - Goes to the Sixers
8 - 1 - Goes to the Rockets
15-1 - goes anywhere else.
I'm tempted to throw some odds up for the Spurs but I think it is just a tad too unlikely to warrant that.
He's staying.Time will tell, but I am betting he moves on. I just don't think there is enough to keep him in Cleveland long term given his other options.
One thing we know about LeBron, he isn't staying just for the sake of staying.
Maybe "rebuilding" is too strong a word. I will say that they are still in "building" phase, and that LeBron would not be as much a priority to their franchise as their young talent is. Whereas is Cleveland, he's the undisputed priority of that franchise, for he has already led them to a championship and are "his team".
So basically, because I'm supposed to believe that only teams with what you personally label as "superstar" players have a chance to win, yet think otherwise...Means I'm not thinking objectively.
OK, then.
And you claim to be a basketball coach in real life...I just wonder what you teach your so-called players if you don't think they have a chance without that so-called "superstar" player.