Everywhere but philly means the little bit of time with Jeff Fischer in St Louis where every other qb failed as well. Kansas city was basically a hand shake.
True, but 2013 is still his only good year as a pro. He didn't do anything in 2012 or 2014 in Philly, either. He's a perfect backup QB but his ability to start a whole year is still a big question mark. Not the type of player you give up a high 2nd for.
The offer was made before they got Tyrod you moron.
To me it doesn't work that way. Sounds like you are trying to justify the draft.
Yeah, that's not really how decisionmaking works. It certainly helps to assuage any consternation on the lack of picks. I am not flaming the Chiefs for not having a 1st round pick for instance. I am giving the Chiefs crap for not making the most of their picks.
That's a big if for a guy that shredded his knee ligaments in the worst possible way and relies on mobility. I'm not saying he's not a stud QB, but the chance that he's injury prone going forward is possible. You lose stability with those sort of injuries.
The Cowboys have what I think is a bad habit of bringing the position coaches of the players they are about to pick into the televised war room well before the pick is made. They brought the OL coach and the defensive coaches before that pick. All of the talk about who Dallas was going to select was Williams or a defensive player (said to be Reid who they also were rumored to try to trade up for in the 3rd). They also looked relieved after the Eagles made their pick. Might they have wanted TE? Anything is possible but in this case it is not very likely that Goedert was a guy they wanted in that spot. Maybe if he were around in the 3rd round they may have thought about him, but contrary to what all the "experts" out there thought the Cowboys did not really prioritize WR or TE the way others thought they should and they got one of each that supposedly they were very high on. So frame it as you may, but there is almost no reason to believe Dallas had any interest in Goedert other than some silly comment in the draft coverage that alluded to it.
The Wentz trade was in the past. The draft was the present. You don't get a bye on a poor draft today (not saying it's actually a poor draft) because of the Wentz trade from two years ago.
And that's gotta be a worry. He went from 46 carries in 16 games in 2016 to 64 carries last year in 13 games. Is that number going to be able to stay there? You'd think they're going to have to figure out how to scale it back.
The Wentz trade was in the past. The draft was the present. You don't get a bye on a poor draft today (not saying it's actually a poor draft) because of the Wentz trade from two years ago.
That's fine, but I was replying to a guy who claimed the eagles only did that to screw dallas which is ridiculous.
The Wentz trade was in the past. The draft was the present. You don't get a bye on a poor draft today (not saying it's actually a poor draft) because of the Wentz trade from two years ago.
I don't think those were all planned QB carries, though.
If the eagles have Tom Brady on their bench as their backup, do they win the super bowl last year? What about Brett Favre? Mary Poppins?
