Cave_Johnson
R.I.P. Bob Saget
Really, though this game went about how I expected it to minus the obvious coaching blunders by Pete. Figured they'd have to score 30+ to win. They did, but that wasn't enough.
Listen you fucking dolt. We are not in charge here. How do you not get this?
We are not responsible in any way for fixing anything. At least I personally have no say or influence on what happens at the VMAC and I'm going out on a limb to say you likely don't either.
So no, we as fans do not have to follow some corporate investigative criteria for post games. It's entirely ludicrous to suggest it. It's really nothing more than you trying once again to be an elitist asshole.
I'll point out again that you pointed the finger at Cable by your own words in prior games. You can't have it both ways.
I'll be waiting for your scathing rebuttal of Calkins from the times, or softy, or brock, or just about everyone else in this city so far saying the same things. Maybe you want to put in a call and suggest some corporate retraining programs for the announcers of tonight's game for their comments? Gruden was questioning the coaches quite a bit. Might need to set him straight. Oh, and the guys at half time as well.
There were plenty of fuck ups and the one that stands out to pretty much everyone else not trying to come off like a better than everyone asshole can see it.
Really, though this game went about how I expected it to minus the obvious coaching blunders by Pete. Figured they'd have to score 30+ to win. They did, but that wasn't enough.
But if Atlanta stops Seattle on one of their scoring drives as well doesn't Atlanta win?Yep totally agree, i figured they needed to win the TO battle ( they didn't ) to win this game and i didn't think Wilson would gift the Falcons 14 points either.
Not one area cost them this game, if the defense stops Atlanta on just one of their scoring drives the Hawks most likely win. If the Coaches don't make boneheaded calls they most likely win and if Wilson doesn't give Atlanta 14 points then they most likely win.
Such a downer, just remove one area of mistakes and they win 7-3 and tied for first is so much better than 6-4 and as of right now OUT of the playoffs.
But if Atlanta stops Seattle on one of their scoring drives as well doesn't Atlanta win?
Are you auditioning to replace John Madden?
Haha that's funny. From your posts it actually makes me look like I'm a bigger Hawk supporter.of Course, what a stupid trollish post by you. What part of Atlanta winning makes you think we would be talking about what Atlanta could do to have won? One thing Atlanta showed is they couldn't stop the Hawks, the Hawks stop themselves. uncharacteristic turnovers by Wilson, continued penalty problems on defense giving teams free first downs ( 4 of them on 3rd downs that turned into 17 points ) and some boneheaded plays by the offense, defense, special teams and Coaching staff. Normally you see one or two from one area or another during a game but not from every facet of the game multiple times in a SINGLE game.
Now continue to troll by all means.
Haha that's funny. From your posts it actually makes me look like I'm a bigger Hawk supporter.
Look you've written a novel on this post. All saying the same thing thing.
The stupidest was, if your team stopped the other team from scoring they would've won.
No shit Captain obvious.
No troll needed here.
But go on keep telling us how the hypothetical team who scores more than their opponent wins
It's not all on Carroll, but the lion's share of it sure as hell is. And a coach should be held to a higher standard than a player, because they don't have to perform physically as well as mentally.
Last nights errors are easily fixed, the crap we saw on the field for the first half of the season wasn't something that could easily be fixed but they seemed to have all their ducks in a row now they just need to get them all moving in the same direction.
I think anyone saying that Wilson is at fault for the fumble doesn't understand how football is played. He got teed up by one player and drilled by the other. And it wasn't like he was holding onto to the ball. That fumble was completely on the OL failing to do their job.
Not going to happen this year. Too many injuries and too big a hill to climb now.
watch the play again he could have thrown it away. right? What about the massive high throw to Lockett? was that not Wilson's fault because Lockett is just to short? Wilson scrambled out of the pocket and his scrambles tend to turn out for the better more often than not but some times he just has to learn when to throw it away. This is nothing new many of you have said it a million times on here.
But Pete Carroll...OMG, the koolaid drinkers are gonna hate me, but, I just can't stand this fool. He is less than a league-average head coach. In Boston, they win because of Bill Belichick. In Seattle, we win in spite of Pete Carroll.
The pick was probably Wilson's fault. It could have been Lockett's fault. The ball wasn't thrown high. It was thrown behind him.
I watch the fumble several times. He had almost no time in the pocket, the LDE was barely slowed by Ifedi.
There is maybe a half second in which Wilson could have made the decision to throw the ball away if he knew the back side pressure was right on him. That isn't reasonable.
That fumble is 100% on Ifedi.
The pick was probably Wilson's fault. It could have been Lockett's fault. The ball wasn't thrown high. It was thrown behind him.
I watch the fumble several times. He had almost no time in the pocket, the LDE was barely slowed by Ifedi.
There is maybe a half second in which Wilson could have made the decision to throw the ball away if he knew the back side pressure was right on him. That isn't reasonable.
That fumble is 100% on Ifedi.