- Thread starter
- #761
The problem with that statement is that it ignores 2 reasons why Ragans was traded.The trade of Ragans was unequivocally worth the world series.
I can't buy this logic. Chapman was total garbage in my opinion. To lose Ragans was inexcusable. Even an amateur like me saw that this guy had turned the corner as a starter and should have gone to AAA and keep starting instead of sticking him in the BP. Anyone with their eyes open could see that Ragans had figured it out as a starter. This was a huge black mark on the front office and coaching staff.Cole Ragans named opening day starter for Kansas City.
The trade of Ragans was unequivocally worth the world series.
He may be great this season and beyond, he may be great this season and good or average in the future, he may get knocked around. We'll have to wait and see.
I will say the Rangers may have been more apt to keep him if they could ever figure out the pitching coach heirarchy from the minors through the show. For some reason this club has never been able to consistently develop quality pitchers, and it is painful to see many moved on to other clubs where they then blossom.
im ok with what Ragans does because Chapman definitely helped us get the trophy.
KC didn't tweak anything with him. That was done by the folks at Tread in the prior offseason. The Royals simply allowed him to start.Re Cole
I was always an advocate to let him be starter depth in AAA
However KC evidently tweaked him in ways the Rangers did not. This is the same with Rays development. They make good pitchers traadee for better.
So the point is he never would have been as good as he became if he stayed with the Rangers.
Now Chapman gave me a heart attack when he pitched. But were we a better pen with him him and did he contribute to win the WS I think so.
But of course now it looks like an overpay giving up Cole?
But I am still pretty ecstatic over the WS and trying to stuff any regrets
The real sin is not the trade but the age old development issue. To me this is crucial for us to get Leiter over the hump
I heard they helped him with a breaking pitchKC didn't tweak anything with him. That was done by the folks at Tread in the prior offseason. The Royals simply allowed him to start.
You beat me to the punch. You are exactly right.KC didn't tweak anything with him. That was done by the folks at Tread in the prior offseason. The Royals simply allowed him to start.
He was lights out in the preseason. To not let him start at AAA is unforgivable. When they actually sent him down to start right before they traded him his value went up.I heard they helped him with a breaking pitch
It was Tread that helped him. Almost exactly a year ago,, Keith Lae listed him in the article,I heard they helped him with a breaking pitch
I am not saying Tread did not help his velocityIt was Tread that helped him. Almost exactly a year ago,, Keith Lae listed him in the article,
MLB players to watch: Keith Law’s 10 candidates for a breakout season in 2023
It was the increased velocity that helped all of his pitches. The fact that the Rangers decision makers couldn't see that is inexcusable. And the fact, that Chapman was needed due to a lack of bullpen building in the 2022-23 offseason is inexcusable.
I have heard so many, over the last 9 months or so, say that giving up Ragans was worth it. That sentiment completely dismisses our very deep farm system, as if Ragans was the only player we could offer. And it completely dismisses the opportunity to acquire a couple more moderately priced relievers in that previous offseason.
Let's just hope CY learned some valuable lessons. I think JD learned some lessons after some very bad trades and I think CY has too.
Lol. He was the one who was rough with folks. He wasn't on the Romeo level, but he was very cantankerous. I know for my part, he left several months after I blocked him, so when he left it wasn't due to any exchange with me.Word to the wise how we treat people is important. Eph dished it out but he had some valuable opinions I think
IMO the board was too rough with him so now he does not frequent
I hate that
In that longer interview Cole mentioned he could work on that slider as a starter. Something he could have done here had the Rangers sent him to Round Rock to start. That possibility with the Rangers was ruined by their decision to shoehorn Cole into a reliever role due to their lack of taking care of that area.Cole interviewed and said he added a slider with the help of the KC brain trust.
x.com
x.com
x.com
x.com
The first interview goes into detail
Like I said I wanted him to continue to start in AAA and not saying he was discounted
But what I said was true despite dispute on the board. Maybe the Rangers would have helped him develop the slider Maybe not