Game Thread: Wolverines vs an entire Army | Noon on FOX

[theboardref]

Or maybe, by definition co-champs actually means they split a championship.

I’m pretty sure the term exists and there is indeed such a thing.

So do 3 teams go to a conference title game? Yes or no.

 

[belcherboy]

So do 3 teams go to a conference title game? Yes or no.

No, but I looked it up on google. In fact, there have been co-division champs and co-conference champs in the past.

As a matter of fact, some teams have given rings. Look it up on google. I’ve seen it.

 

[theboardref]

No, but I looked it up on google. In fact, there have been co-division champs and co-conference champs in the past.

As a matter of fact, some teams have given rings. Look it up on google. I’ve seen it.

Which makes them... losers.

So Michigan is = UCF? Got it.

 

[belcherboy]

Which makes them... losers.

So Michigan is = UCF? Got it.

Or co-champs? You can choose. I think UCF won their conference outright. I’m not sure why you call them co-champs.

 

[Erie Warrior]

That false start, at the goal line, killed Army. It shouldn't have even gone into OT.

 

[belcherboy]

That false start, at the goal line, killed Army. It shouldn't have even gone into OT.

The offsides by Michigan gave them another chance in OT too. Goes both ways.

 

[Erie Warrior]

The offsides by Michigan gave them another chance in OT too. Goes both ways.

Eh, I guess.

Either way, was an exciting game and Army should be proud of the game they played.

 

[theboardref]

Or co-champs? You can choose. I think UCF won their conference outright. I’m not sure why you call them co-champs.

They claim to win a title they took no part in. So that makes them equal to Michigan.

 

[theboardref]

Eh, I guess.

Either way, was an exciting game and Army should be proud of the game they played.

Once you get to OT, it is hard for the smaller guys to win.

 

[belcherboy]

They claim to win a title they took no part in. So that makes them equal to Michigan.

Again, co-champs is sharing a title. I don’t think UCF claimed a share. I thought they claimed the whole thing.

Co-champs are real. I’ve seen it in many conferences in my lifetime.

 

[theboardref]

Again, co-champs is sharing a title. I don’t think UCF claimed a share. I thought they claimed the whole thing.

Co-champs are real. I’ve seen it in many conferences in my lifetime.

I mean however you wanna rationalize celebrating coming second in a division of a conference is fine, it just makes you and/or your fan base losers.

 

[Wamu]

Again, co-champs is sharing a title. I don’t think UCF claimed a share. I thought they claimed the whole thing.

Co-champs are real. I’ve seen it in many conferences in my lifetime.

Please keep celebrating getting a share of the division last year but not playing in the CCG. It's really funny stuff.

 

[belcherboy]

I mean however you wanna rationalize celebrating coming second in a division of a conference is fine, it just makes you and/or your fan base losers.

Actually, it makes us co-champs! 2nd place isn’t a tie for 1st. I’m not sure why you are struggling with this.

 

[theboardref]

Actually, it makes us co-champs! 2nd place isn’t a tie for 1st. I’m not sure why you are struggling with this.

Then show me where 3 teams played in one stadium for a conference title.

 

[belcherboy]

Please keep celebrating getting a share of the division last year but not playing in the CCG. It's really funny stuff.

It’s actually got a technical term. It’s pronounced co-champs!

 

[belcherboy]

Then show me where 3 teams played in one stadium for a conference title.

I can’t do that, but I can show you how every conference has had multiple co-champs in its history. You said they didn’t exist, but they actually do!

 

[theboardref]

I can’t do that, but I can show you how every conference has had multiple co-champs in its history. You said they didn’t exist, but they actually do!

They do if you are the loser sitting at home. No one recognizes the second place team in their division as a co-champ except for the loser team.

 

[belcherboy]

They do if you are the loser sitting at home. No one recognizes the second place team in their division as a co-champ except for the loser team.

Finally! You admit you’re wrong. Co-champs actually share first place. Now if you are wrong about that, maybe you should re-think your other opinions?

 

[Wamu]

It’s pronounced co-champs!

I understand why you're celebrating getting a share of the division but not playing in the CCG. You have next to nothing to celebrate this century.

It really is sad how far some of you meeeechegan fans have fallen. You think getting a share of the division is some kinda great accmplishment.

 

[theboardref]

I understand why you're celebrating getting a share of the division but not playing in the CCG. You have next to nothing to celebrate this century.

It really is sad how far some of you meeeechegan fans have fallen. You think getting a share of the division is some kinda great accmplishment.

They were good when leather helmets were a thing.