This thread will not backfire.
This thread will not backfire.
Why were the (underachieving like no other) donghorns ranked?
2017: (7-6)
2016: (5-7)
2015: (5-7)
2014: (6-7)
I think those teams started out pre season top 25, so I understand why some of them are still ranked. However, the Aggies weren't ranked pre season at all. Hence the reason, why are they ranked?
For the record, Texas had no business whatsoever being ranked pre season. The true Orangebloods knew what the shit show would look like before the season started. Anyway, I never knew you could get ranked for barely losing and beating two high school teams.
Time of the month???
Washington, Wisconsin, and Miami have been fairly good recently, A&M hasn’t won more than 8 games since 2013 when their OOC schedule was Rice, Sam Houston State, UTEP, and SMU. That was also the last time they finished a season ranked.
I don't think its out of line for them to be in the 20's neighborhoodNot trolling, just asking. I didn’t know you get put in the top 25 for barely losing.
Northwest State Tech?You just can't ignore dominant performances against Louisiana-Monroe and whatever NWST is.
I'd say that's your issue, but with you it's always "what are the Aggies up to?"
They were ranked high, dropped when they lost, a bunch of teams lost that were above them. Are you suggesting that the teams that lost shouldn’t have dropped? And I would have no problem either MSU not being ranked right now. I said they were ranked way too high to start the season.Michigan State lost to unranked ASU and then on a bye week moved up a spot. Where is OP's outrage over that?
New Wexico StateNorthwest State Tech?
I don't think its out of line for them to be in the 20's neighborhood
New Wisconsin School for Transportation?New Wexico State
No one does except schlonghorn and jaded big12 homers.
They need 25 warm bodies, nothing more.
They were ranked high, dropped when they lost, a bunch of teams lost that were above them. Are you suggesting that the teams that lost shouldn’t have dropped? And I would have no problem either MSU not being ranked right now. I said they were ranked way too high to start the season.
A&M has no recent history of being a good team to fall back on, so there is no reason for voters to give them the benefit of the doubt, at this time.
Texas being ranked at the beginning of the season was a joke and I would have taken them in the over/under ranked contest but it could only yield 3 points for me.
Well bending over cold bodies is necrophilia and shouldn’t be watched.It helps if those warm bodies are about to play another warm body, so they can hype it on TV
Pollsters did the same thing to South Carolina, right before the Georgia game. They got shellacked, as expected, went right back out of the warm bodies list
Science
New Wisconsin School for Transportation?
1) Have you seen what Utah State has been doing this year? They have put up over 130 points in their last two games. They look like a decent team.1) I never said A&M should be ranked. I agree that we don't have a top 25 resume
2) I don't give a shit if MSU moved up or is ranked. But if OP is so worried about the "sanctity" of the top 25 then why isn't he bitching about MSU barely beating Utah St, losing to ASU, and then not playing but moving up in the polls?
3) The MSU example is just me pointing out how the OP doesn't really care about the polls, he is just pissed because A&M is getting more positive attention than his shitass team.
It helps if those warm bodies are about to play another warm body, so they can hype it on TV
Pollsters did the same thing to South Carolina, right before the Georgia game. They got shellacked, as expected, went right back out of the warm bodies list
Science