- Thread starter
- #1
MHSL82
Well-Known Member
One thing I don't understand is how fans call their team or other team's cheap when there's a minimum salary requirement. The money not used is then rolled over and their minimum salary requirement for the next year goes up. That would increase as long as they didn't max out in total salaries one year.
A GM could therefore, when "cheaply" refusing to "pay" an expensive player, spread the cap around to middle of the road to slightly above average players instead. The total bill is the same. If one refuses to buy lobster at a restaurant but orders several appetizers, he isn't cheap. He could be wrong, I suppose, but not cheap.
A GM could be cheap with stadium renovations, cheap to pay cheerleaders, hire cheap non-capped coaches, etc., but players? Again, you can sign the wrong players and overpay average players, but not paying the elite, isn't cheap... or am I missing something here?
A GM could therefore, when "cheaply" refusing to "pay" an expensive player, spread the cap around to middle of the road to slightly above average players instead. The total bill is the same. If one refuses to buy lobster at a restaurant but orders several appetizers, he isn't cheap. He could be wrong, I suppose, but not cheap.
A GM could be cheap with stadium renovations, cheap to pay cheerleaders, hire cheap non-capped coaches, etc., but players? Again, you can sign the wrong players and overpay average players, but not paying the elite, isn't cheap... or am I missing something here?