- Thread starter
- #1
SteelersPride
Well-Known Member
who you got
BoldJoe Mixon
mostly CLUELESSBold
Either or. I do think as far as football is concerned Mixon will be pretty darn good in the NFL; and would want the Chiefs to draft him if it were just football with him.Or a joke.
Either or. I do think as far as football is concerned Mixon will be pretty darn good in the NFL; and would want the Chiefs to draft him if it were just football with him.
wasn't all that funnyOr a joke.
Give it a little more time... At the rate Elliot is making headlines for off-field issues he'll be the same tool.you couldn't go wrong with either of the top three as players.
I think the pittsburgh back isn't the sharpest tool in the shed and thus I'd go with either of the other two first.
I picked Elloitt mostly cause I'm a homer but I also don't think we've seen is best just yet. This guy blocks better than any back in football and Dallas hasn't even tapped in to his receiving skills
Not much skin in this game, but I would take Elliott over Bell. Bell doesn't have the same top gear, and I think Elliott runs with more power. Bell is really good, but every time I watch him I can't not think how he would get smashed behind Seattle's line when he stands around looking for a hole. He would have to completely change that part of his game on a lesser line than what he has now.
You mean TMZ following him around? What's up with that.Give it a little more time... At the rate Elliot is making headlines for off-field issues he'll be the same tool.
this is trueThis is for 2016 right, Because in 2015 most these guys were no where close to being labeled the Best...
Makes you wonder what 2017 will bring......
pure homer view...as is mineAs far as talent goes, right now the only answer is Le'Veon Bell... But if we're honest and ask whose the best professional athlete, a player you want to draft as a GM, I'd go with David Johnson. As far as I know he hasn't had any off the field issues, he's a hard worker, and he has all the tools to become the player Bell is.