- Thread starter
- #121
dkmightyhammer
Livin' la vida loca
Ya for sure. Everybody, including the teams, are just using their best guesses as to who will be good or bad.Of course. If the Seahawks didn't have a elite defense that allowed Wilson to develop into what he became and he was instead asked to sling it from day 1, his entire career may have been different. Would Mahomes be Mahomes if he were playing for the Lions?
But if the Seahawks took Cousins or Foles instead of Wilson, would they have won a Super Bowl? It's not like the Seahawks were CERTAIN that Wilson was going to be what he was or they would have taken him in the 1st round.
Is it possible that they will find another really good QB in the draft? Sure but the odds are not in their favor.
Think about this too: how many head coaches/teams would have allowed a 3rd round rookie QB (who was too short) to come in and take the starting job away from a QB they just acquired (and gave a 3 year contract deal too) only a couple months earlier? Wilson was extremely fortunate to have coaches and ownership that were willing to let him compete, and win that job. Most franchises would never do that. History could be so much different if Carroll insisted on going with Matt Flynn as the day one starter. And with that young, unknown defense just taking off in 2012 maybe Matt Flynn's the guy whose career goes upward like a rocket if he'd been given the reins. It's truly amazing the butterfly effect that some of these player decisions have in the NFL.