Seems Brady is getting the most votes because he has the most rings. But Eli owned him twice in the only thing that matters so therefore Eli is the best ever.
I'm going to do a breakdown of this later when I get time using stats and playoff performanceAaron Rodgers is easily the best all time statistically.
I'll take 4-0 and 11-0 in Super Bowls. Montana is undefeated and never threw an int in the big game.
I'm going to do a breakdown of this later when I get time using stats and playoff performance
Funny, I watched both of those games start to finish and I cannot remember Eli playing one snap on defense.
Aaron Rodgers is easily the best all time statistically.
I'll take 4-0 and 11-0 in Super Bowls. Montana is undefeated and never threw an int in the big game.
He was defeated before he got to the Superbowl.
Better to win the conference championship and lose in the Superbowl than it is to lose the conference...or before.
Belichick never brought in another QB to push Brady to be his best like Walsh did with Steve Young.
Brady pushes himself.
Montana was a slacker.
Rodgers has close to 4 to 1 tds to ints and the highest QB rating in history.
Montana was easily the best in Super Bowls.
You do realize the 5 yard no contact rule was enforced in 2005?
Rodgers started in the league full time in 2008, the year Brady was injured so I have the stats for all the games for Rodgers since 08 and Brady since 07 to keep it comparable, only regular season games and not playoffs.
Rodgers 135 games 297 tds 72 int 4.125 td/int ratio 36523 yards 266.6 ypg
Brady 140 games 309 tds 74 int 4.175 td/int ratio 39942 yards 285.3 ypg
Good detective work. Of course Montana played in a much more physical era for both receivers and QBs.
Why is he easily the best all time statistically? Because he has the highest passer rating? Rodgers career passer rating is 21.9% higher than the league average over his career. Brady is 18.6% higher than league average over his career. Brady has done that over 3600 more pass attempts and 100 more starts than Rodgers. If Rodgers maintains that for his whole career, you can make an argument, but as of now, he has a long way to go.Aaron Rodgers is easily the best all time statistically.
I'll take 4-0 and 11-0 in Super Bowls. Montana is undefeated and never threw an int in the big game.
Why is he easily the best all time statistically? Because he has the highest passer rating? Rodgers career passer rating is 21.9% higher than the league average over his career. Brady is 18.6% higher than league average over his career. Brady has done that over 3600 more pass attempts and 100 more starts than Rodgers. If Rodgers maintains that for his whole career, you can make an argument, but as of now, he has a long way to go.
And why is 4-0 better than 5-2? If the Pats had lost the AFC Championship in 2007 and 2011, that would make Brady a better QB? Montana may have never thrown a pick in the Super Bowl, but he did go 3 straight years of one-and-done, including getting benched in a playoff game.
So if the Pats lost in the AFC Championship in 2007 and 2011, you would think Brady is a better QB?4-0 is 100%, 5-2 is 71%...da.
Montana a slacker ? you're either joking or clueless.
doesnt he hold the record for most consecutive completions to begin a superbowl?That was really the only Super Bowl Brady was great in.
He did get out played by the lesser Manning Brother in 2 of them.
because HOFer jerry rices sticky gloves (oops, everyone did it i mean!) didnt allow drops.Aaron Rodgers is easily the best all time statistically.
I'll take 4-0 and 11-0 in Super Bowls. Montana is undefeated and never threw an int in the big game.
Rodgers has close to 4 to 1 tds to ints and the highest QB rating in history.
Montana was easily the best in Super Bowls.