- Thread starter
- #61
Retroram52
Moderator
Quinn redeemed his offsides penalty with that sack.
That's Retroram & Smed territory, you might just be the Imperial Potentate, so to speak around here....Thanks Vita. I've been a Ram fan since 1954. I have been in the Coliseum many times in the past 60 years.
Apparently he fumbled the ball before he went out of bounds at the two?The TD with Gurley was called a touchback because he fumbled the ball and it touched the pylon as he was going over the goal line. By rule, it is a touchback in that regard.
My first Ram game was against the 49ers with an attendance of 104,000.That's Retroram & Smed territory, you might just be the Imperial Potentate, so to speak around here....
What more do you want? That was a pretty interesting 1st half!This game is going to get interesting in the 2nd half.
I guess that's what I'm arguing, I don't know that it was the right call.I hear ya, it was the right call, but still SUCKS
I understand the rule, but since no fumble was called on the field, the fumble shouldn't be looked at. They were in review to see if he scored a TD or not and that should be it.The TD with Gurley was called a touchback because he fumbled the ball and it touched the pylon as he was going over the goal line. By rule, it is a touchback in that regard.
I guess that's what I'm arguing, I don't know that it was the right call.
It was the right result, but since no fumble was called on the field, Pete should have had to a challenge to get the fumble looked at.
If the Rams get the ball off before he decides to do that, or if he is not sure if he wants to use his challenge or not should all come into play, and it didn't play out like that...