- Thread starter
- #1
Redskins vs. Chiefs: Washington?s special teams sink to a new low - The Washington Post
The issues that currently beset this organization are deep. This report (if true) opens a entirely new set of questions concerning player perspectives, attitudes, and resentment relating to judgments made whatever their basis.
So, what are they actually saying.........It appears that some are saying that the guy in front of them didn't deserve to be there. If indeed they were starter worthy why were they not starting? How deep did the resentments go and grow as the team faltered? Did they discuss their viewpoints with their position coaches and HC. What action or inactions were the result of these discussions. Did some players retain their starter status because of the money paid them and not because they earned the start. Was the best team actually put on the field?
The issues that currently beset this organization are deep. This report (if true) opens a entirely new set of questions concerning player perspectives, attitudes, and resentment relating to judgments made whatever their basis.
So, what are they actually saying.........It appears that some are saying that the guy in front of them didn't deserve to be there. If indeed they were starter worthy why were they not starting? How deep did the resentments go and grow as the team faltered? Did they discuss their viewpoints with their position coaches and HC. What action or inactions were the result of these discussions. Did some players retain their starter status because of the money paid them and not because they earned the start. Was the best team actually put on the field?