USC schedules it's first FCS team in the program's history

[AlaskaGuy]

 

[AlaskaGuy]

@ericd7633 you were late by a minute.

 

[AlaskaGuy]

 

[Justin Tyme]

 

[Lance Armstrong]

why start now?

 

[AlaskaGuy]

why start now?

 

[Inquisitor95]

Congrats?

 

[BamaDude]

why start now?

They are trying to get back on a winning track.

 

[trojanfight]

bragging rights about not playing FCS teams is cool and all. meanwhile watching the success of SEC and ACC champions continually play those teams and not get knocked for it. now if they will just schedule them in november they will be set.

also the conference didn’t do USC any favors moving stanford up to the 2nd or 3rd game for the last few years. stanford is one of their toughest opponents every year. it would be the equivalent of alabama playing auburn or LSU in week 2 instead of new mexico st

 

[iesheepdog]

I suppose it makes sense, but I still don’t like it. Also, once again they didn’t call me for an opinion. I am beginning to think they lost my number.

 

[7Samurai13]

bragging rights about not playing FCS teams is cool and all. meanwhile watching the success of SEC and ACC champions continually play those teams and not get knocked for it. now if they will just schedule them in november they will be set.

also the conference didn’t do USC any favors moving stanford up to the 2nd or 3rd game for the last few years. stanford is one of their toughest opponents every year. it would be the equivalent of alabama playing auburn or LSU in week 2 instead of new mexico st

Yes because not playing an FCS team is what is having USC lose 3 to 7 games every year.

 

[Rolltide94]

bragging rights about not playing FCS teams is cool and all. meanwhile watching the success of SEC and ACC champions continually play those teams and not get knocked for it. now if they will just schedule them in november they will be set.

also the conference didn’t do USC any favors moving stanford up to the 2nd or 3rd game for the last few years. stanford is one of their toughest opponents every year. it would be the equivalent of alabama playing auburn or LSU in week 2 instead of new mexico st

Today I learned Auburn and LSU...two teams that have played for 5 National Champions since the BCS era and won 3 of them, while winning 7 SEC Conference Championships is equivalent to a team that hasn't had better than a 2 loss season since Pearl Harbor wasn't just a place...also the last time they played for a National Championship.

We've played Ole Miss and Texas A&M multiple times in the first 3 weeks this decade...we've actually lost to both of them in the last 10 years, which would be something we haven't done to a Pac team since you guys beat us....in 1970.

52-6 called and said maybe you should schedule some more FCS teams...apparently you could use the tune-up, clearly the only difference between the best Pac teams and the best SEC and ACC teams is how many FCS teams they play.

 

[Hang_On_Sloopy08]

It’s going to be their first loss to a FCS team too.

 

[iesheepdog]

It’s going to be their first loss to a FCS team too.

If Helton is still steering the ship, it wouldn’t surprise me.

 

[wazzu31]

bragging rights about not playing FCS teams is cool and all. meanwhile watching the success of SEC and ACC champions continually play those teams and not get knocked for it. now if they will just schedule them in november they will be set.

also the conference didn’t do USC any favors moving stanford up to the 2nd or 3rd game for the last few years. stanford is one of their toughest opponents every year. it would be the equivalent of alabama playing auburn or LSU in week 2 instead of new mexico st

USC and Stanford have done a disservice to every other member by having all our schedule based around stupid Notre Dame. If you guys are going to keep that irrelevant game on the schedule you might as well not face a FCS school either.

 

[Shower Fart]

USC and Stanford have done a disservice to every other member by having all our schedule based around stupid Notre Dame. If you guys are going to keep that irrelevant game on the schedule you might as well not face a FCS school either.

How so? Everyone has OOC games, might as well have a big name. Although it helps ND a lot more than the team they play.

 

[michaeljordan_fan]

USC and Stanford have done a disservice to every other member by having all our schedule based around stupid Notre Dame. If you guys are going to keep that irrelevant game on the schedule you might as well not face a FCS school either.

This made no sense.

 

[jjc2009]

USC and Stanford have done a disservice to every other member by having all our schedule based around stupid Notre Dame. If you guys are going to keep that irrelevant game on the schedule you might as well not face a FCS school either.

Irrelevant, lol.

 

[trojanfan12]

This made no sense.

To be fair, he's a Coug. Probably posted after finishing off a bottle of Fireball. lol

 

[trojanfan12]

I suppose it makes sense, but I still don’t like it. Also, once again they didn’t call me for an opinion. I am beginning to think they lost my number.

Yeah, I don't like it either. Don't see me going to any games vs. FCS teams.