USC most wins over ranked opponents in AP history

[TROJAN-MAN]

You still in Big Bend, Rich?

YUP, Big Bend

 

[boxedlunch]

YUP, Big Bend

Don't like it, I gather?

 

[trojanfan12]

OMG!!! Look you stupid ass, he's trying to tell you he is the KTFFAN that wrote the ORIGINAL article that the tweet referenced. He is the originator of the original DATA that you keep referring to. He knows the context. The problem is you DO NOT!!!! The site College Football Trivia , it is his data. He has stats on all games going back to the original Princeton vs Rutgers game 1869.

I don't know which of the USC fans is stupider: Trojan-man, Clarkson, or SoCal-Jim. Maybe they are the same person after all what are the chances that one school could produce THREE such clueless idiots. That would be a stretch even for California!!!! Good God!

I smell an imminent meltdown.

 

[Wild Turkey]

Mods can you move this thread to the gay dating bd where it's more appropriate?

Thank You

 

[TheRobotDevil]

OMG!!! Look you stupid ass, he's trying to tell you he is the KTFFAN that wrote the ORIGINAL article that the tweet referenced. He is the originator of the original DATA that you keep referring to. He knows the context. The problem is you DO NOT!!!! The site College Football Trivia , it is his data. He has stats on all games going back to the original Princeton vs Rutgers game 1869.

I don't know which of the USC fans is stupider: Trojan-man, Clarkson, or SoCal-Jim. Maybe they are the same person after all what are the chances that one school could produce THREE such clueless idiots. That would be a stretch even for California!!!! Good God!

Anyone can skew stats its what teams that want to feel special do. I can skew stats all day. The stat in the OT tells me all I need to know. While the Gators play the mean Green and Blue hose. SC does not fear scheduling anybody and defeating those top tier teams they schedule which is impressive,. While you play what is basically two extra bye weeks. SC will be playing Bama ,ND,Etc.....

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Mods can you move this thread to the gay dating bd where it's more appropriate?

Thank You

Lunchbox and gator do seem pretty tight and i use that term loosely

 

[Cochise_]

Only one team as of 2010 was above .500 winning percentage vs Top 10 in either the AP or Coaches Poll.

How many teams have since reached or surpassed .500 winning percentage?

Record VS Top 10 Teams Game Time

Home Page

Current FBS/D1A teams ranked by winning %, vs opponents that are ranked in top 10 at game time in either the AP or Coaches Polls, through the 2010 season. Since 1974 the Coaches Poll has not ranked teams on major NCAA or conference probation. From 1962-1967 the AP only did a top 10 ranking. AP poll since 1936, Coaches since 1950 (minimum 10 games)

1. USC (76-74-7)--0.50637
2. Oklahoma (69-71-4)--0.49306
3. Notre Dame (80-87-6)--0.47977
4. Michigan (70-77-6)--0.47712
5. Texas (65-75-4)--0.46528
6. Ohio St. (59-71-9)--0.45683
7. Florida St. (44-55-3)--0.44608
8. Miami (FL) (52-66-1)--0.44118
9. Alabama (59-75-0)--0.44030
10. UCLA (50-77-5)--0.39773
11. Penn St. (43-66-1)--0.39545
12. Florida (54-86-4)--0.38889
13. Auburn (52-84-3)--0.38489
14. Tennessee (50-87-6)--0.37063
15. LSU (47-86-4)--0.35766
16. Nebraska (44-81-1)--0.35317
17. Georgia (36-68-3)--0.35047
18. Michigan St. (43-84-2)--0.34109
19. Army (16-42-6)--0.29688
20. Houston (17-45-5)--0.29104
21. Washington (31-81-5)--0.28632
22. Purdue (37-100-4)--0.27660
23. Georgia Tech (30-82-2)--0.27193
24. Mississippi (28-75-0)--0.27184
25. Stanford (29-88-5)--0.25820
26. Texas A&M (27-80-2)--0.25688
27. Pittsburgh (31-95-5)--0.25573
28. Iowa (36-109-1)--0.25000
28. Arizona (16-49-1)--0.25000
30. Clemson (15-47-1)--0.24603
31. Arkansas (29-92-3)--0.24597
32. Arizona St. (12-38-0)--0.24000
33. Colorado (27-89-3)--0.23950
34. Oregon (19-69-3)--0.22527
35. Illinois (29-107-4)--0.22143
36. Wisconsin (28-111-4)--0.20979
37. Navy (19-76-3)--0.20918
38. Boston College (13-51-1)--0.20769
39. TCU (18-76-4)--0.20408
40. Minnesota (25-105-4)--0.20149
41. Louisville (5-22-1)--0.19643
42. Syracuse (15-65-1)--0.19136
43. SMU (15-73-5)--0.18817
44. BYU (4-19-1)--0.18750
45. Oregon St. (17-83-1)--0.17327
46. N.C. State (10-50-1)--0.17213
47. Missouri (23-111-0)--0.17164
48. Maryland (13-63-0)--0.17105
48. Duke (11-61-4)--0.17105
50. Air Force (6-35-3)--0.17045
51. Baylor (17-89-2)--0.16667
51. North Carolina (13-67-1)--0.16667
51. Hawaii (3-15-0)--0.16667
54. Virginia (8-43-1)--0.16346
55. Texas Tech (14-77-0)--0.15385
56. Northwestern (20-116-2)--0.15217
57. West Virginia (10-59-1)--0.15000
57. Utah (3-17-0)--0.15000
59. Southern Miss. (5-31-1)--0.14865
60. Virginia Tech (8-46-0)--0.14815
61. San Jose St. (3-18-0)--0.14286
62. Rice (13-84-2)--0.14141
63. Washington St. (10-66-0)--0.13158
64. Tulane (10-71-1)--0.12805
65. South Carolina (11-75-0)--0.12791
66. Kentucky (14-99-1)--0.12719
67. Miami (OH) (2-14-0)--0.12500
68. Mississippi St. (12-95-2)--0.11927
69. Memphis (3-29-2)--0.11765
70. Oklahoma St. (13-101-1)--0.11739
71. Colorado St. (3-25-0)--0.10714
72. Kansas (11-102-2)--0.10435
73. Fresno St. (1-9-0)--0.10000
73. Marshall (1-9-0)--0.10000
75. California (9-98-3)--0.09545
76. Tulsa (3-31-0)--0.08824
77. Iowa St. (7-94-2)--0.07767
78. Rutgers (2-33-1)--0.06944
79. UTEP (1-14-0)--0.06667
80. Indiana (6-91-1)--0.06633
81. Kansas St. (7-100-0)--0.06542
82. East Caro. (2-29-0)--0.06452
83. New Mexico (1-17-0)--0.05556
84. Vanderbilt (6-103-0)--0.05505
85. Cincinnati (2-36-0)--0.05263
86. Temple (2-44-0)--0.04348
87. Wake Forest (1-48-0)--0.02041
88. Idaho (0-10-0)--0.00000
88. Northern Ill. (0-11-0)--0.00000
88. La.-Monroe (0-11-0)--0.00000
88. La.-Lafayette (0-11-0)--0.00000
88. Central Fla. (0-14-0)--0.00000
88. New Mexico St. (0-16-0)--0.00000
88. San Diego St. (0-21-0)--0.00000
88. North Texas (0-21-0)--0.00000
88. Utah St. (0-25-0)--0.00000
88. Louisiana Tech (0-26-0)--0.00000
88. Wyoming (0-27-0)--0.00000

 

[963BUSC]

I fully understand the original stat, I developed it and posted it. It was not "most wins vs ranked teams". That was the take the USC guy took from my stats. He made a relevant take on the stats I provided. I have zero problem with that. I'm just wondering when someone else takes a slightly different, yet relevant take, you claim it's out of bounds. Seems like the same thing to me.

Hey, cool site by the way. Thanks for setting it up.

 

[Cochise_]

 

[Gator]

Only one team as of 2010 was above .500 winning percentage vs Top 10 in either the AP or Coaches Poll.

How many teams have since reached or surpassed .500 winning percentage?

Record VS Top 10 Teams Game Time

Home Page

2010?????

If you want more up-to-date data try this site:

College Football Trivia


Click here for more feel-good data on game-time top 10 opponents up through 2015:
College Football Trivia

 

[HuskerOC]

72. Kansas (11-102-2)--0.10435
81. Kansas St. (7-100-0)--0.06542

I know that Kansas State was resurrected from nearly 100 years of death by Snyder, but this is still amazing to me.

Only 7 wins over ranked opponents?

And still way behind Kansas?

 

[TheRobotDevil]

View attachment 121436

I smell an imminent meltdown.

Will the gator write his manifesto. Or will he copy and paste it in statistical form?

 

[TheRobotDevil]

2010?????

If you want more up-to-date data try this site:

College Football Trivia


Click here for more feel-good data on game-time top 10 opponents up through 2015:
College Football Trivia

Now it makes sense lets trust a site where 420 ranks first over 81-78-7 are you high bro

 

[Gator]

Now it makes sense lets trust a site where 420 ranks first over 81-78-7 are you high bro

Reading never has been high on your list of things to learn.

I realize in your world, any data set that doesn't have USC at the top means the data has been skewed!

It is listed by winning percentage which is clear IF one can read.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Reading never has been high on your list of things to learn.

I realize in your world, any data set that doesn't have USC at the top means the data has been skewed!

It is listed by winning percentage which is clear IF one can read.

Never said that. Also haven't seen you post "data" that wasn't skewed.Its going to be OK the gators may eventually be relevant again. Chin up princess you can read stats while you wait

 

[Gator]

Never said that. Also haven't seen you post "data" that wasn't skewed.

Too bad you have no idea what "skewing" data means.

Its going to be OK the gators may eventually be relevant again. Chin up princess you can read stats while you wait

Thanks for the cheery vote of confidence regarding the Gators! Unfortunately, I can't return the favor as you won't live long enough for the Trojans to be relevant again (unless you channel your inner Sequoia).

 

[TheRobotDevil]

Too bad you have no idea what "skewing" data means.



Thanks for the cheery vote of confidence regarding the Gators! Unfortunately, I can't return the favor as you won't live long enough for the Trojans to be relevant again (unless you channel your inner Sequoia).

Its using the numbers you want in order to give the illusion you desire. You do it all the time i et the feeling your a bit insecure. You also show A high tendency of relying far too heavily on stats. As though you're trying to over compensate for something The gators will never be SC

 

[Gator]

Its using the numbers you want in order to give the illusion you desire. You do it all the time i et the feeling your a bit insecure. You also show A high tendency of relying far too heavily on stats.

No, it is called presenting the FACTS. Just because YOU don't like the facts that I give doesn't make them skewed or untrue. You NEVER give anything resembling facts to back up anything that you claim.

As though you're trying to over compensate for something The gators will never be SC

God, I hope not. Florida is too good to be SC-- EVEN if you were referring to "good" SC, South Carolina! Except for the occasional spasm of cheating, USC hasn't been relevant since the days of John McKay -- 40 to 50 years ago.

 

[TheRobotDevil]

No, it is called presenting the FACTS. Just because YOU don't like the facts that I give doesn't make them skewed or untrue. You NEVER give anything resembling facts to back up anything that you claim.



God, I hope not. Florida is too good to be SC-- EVEN if you were referring to "good" SC, South Carolina! Except for the occasional spasm of cheating, USC hasn't been relevant since the days of John McKay -- 40 to 50 years ago.

Can I get the stats for the amount of your posts i read? Truth is no matter what stats you post to try portray florida as significant. They will never be SC. not even close. SC is A blue blood